Study on the diagnostic value of 3.0T magnetic resonance high b-value diffusion weighted imaging for endometrial carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20230526-00564
- VernacularTitle:3.0T磁共振高b值弥散加权成像对子宫内膜癌的诊断价值研究
- Author:
Ying MENG
1
;
Yuting LIANG
;
Xinlian WANG
;
Keyang WANG
;
Mingming LIU
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院 北京妇幼保健院放射科，北京 100006
- Keywords:
Endometrial neoplasms;
Endometrial hyperplasia;
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging;
Diagnosis, differential;
B-value
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2024;47(5):460-465
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of 3.0T magnetic resonance with high b-value diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for endometrial carcinoma (EC).Methods:The clinical data of 118 patients with suspected endometrial lesions were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 83 cases were pathologically diagnosed as EC (EC group), and 35 cases were diagnosed as complex or atypical hyperplasia (endometrial hyperplasia group). In addition, 47 patients with normal endometrial (normal endometrial group) in the same period were selected. All patients underwent 3.0T MRI conventional T 2-weighted imaging (T 2WI) and multiple b-value (0, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1 000, 2 000, 3 000 and 4 000 s/mm 2) DWI scans. The endometrial signal intensity on different b-value DWI was measured. The b-value-endometrial signal intensity curve was drawn, and the decline degree of endometrial signal intensity was calculated. Results:When b-value was 300, 400, 600 and 800 s/mm 2, there was no significant difference in endometrial signal intensity among the three groups ( P>0.05); when b-value was 1 000, 2 000, 3 000 and 4 000 s/mm 2, the signal intensity in EC group was significantly higher than that in normal endometrial group and endometrial hyperplasia group (456.1 ± 119.4 vs. 371.3 ± 99.9 and 381.6 ± 184.8, 284.2 ± 91.9 vs. 163.2 ± 46.5 and 191.4 ± 110.8, 196.7 ± 72.4 vs. 103.7 ± 30.9 and 129.4 ± 83.1, 151.6 ± 54.8 vs. 74.6 ± 20.8 and 101.1 ± 60.7), and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05); while there was no significant difference between normal endometrial group and endometrial hyperplasia group ( P>0.05). The results of b-value-endometrial signal intensity curve showed that the decrease of endometrial signal intensity in EC group was significantly lower than that in normal endometrial group and endometrial hyperplasia group (0.79 ± 0.05 vs. 0.90 ± 0.03 and 0.87 ± 0.04), the index in endometrial hyperplasia group was significantly lower than that in normal endometrial group, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:High b-value DWI is useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant endometrial lesions, and it can improve the qualitative diagnostic value of EC.
