Prognostic analysis of 19 newly treated multiple myeloma patients with t(14; 16)
10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240814-00303
- VernacularTitle:伴t(14;16)的初治多发性骨髓瘤19例预后分析
- Author:
Ye LI
1
;
Junru LIU
;
Juan LI
;
Wenming CHEN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院血液科 北京市多发性骨髓瘤医疗研究中心，北京 100020
- Keywords:
Multiple myeloma;
Prognosis;
t (14;
16);
Cytogenetics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hematology
2024;45(10):944-950
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t (14;16) abnormality.Methods:Clinical data from 564 patients diagnosed with initial MM from January 2018 to November 2020 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The prognoses of patients with t (14;16) were analyzed and compared with the prognoses of patients with normal FISH, and those with t (4;14) and del (17p) .Results:Among 564 newly diagnosed MM patients, 19 (3.4%) exhibited t (14;16) abnormalities, with 14 cases diagnosed with 1q21+ and three cases with del (17p). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with t (14;16) were significantly shorter compared with patients with normal FISH (the median PFS: 14 months vs not reached, P<0.001; the median OS: 42 months vs not reached, P=0.002). No statistically significant difference was detected in PFS and OS between the 15 patients with t (14;16) and the 15 with t (4;14) after propensity score matching (the median PFS: 13.0 months vs not reached, P=0.247; the median OS: 42 months vs not reached, P=0.609). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between 15 patients with t (14;16) and 15 with del (17p) (the median PFS: 13 months vs 31 months, P=0.939; the median OS: 42 months vs 37.3 months, P=0.557). Propensity score matching indicated that when combined with 1q21+, no statistically significant differences were present in PFS and OS between patients with t (14;16) and patients with t (4;14) or patients with del (17p) (all P>0.05). Whether or not the patients with t (14;16) had undergone auto-HSCT did not significantly impact the PFS and OS (all P>0.05) . Conclusion:t (14;16) is often associated with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in newly diagnosed MM patients, and its adverse prognostic value is similar to that of t (4;14) and del (17p) .
