Clinical efficacy and safety of blinatumomab bridging CAR-T cell therapy in the treatment of patients with adult acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia
10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20231127-00283
- VernacularTitle:贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T细胞疗法治疗成人急性B淋巴细胞白血病疗效及安全性分析
- Author:
Yan PU
1
;
Xiangyue ZHOU
;
Yin LIU
;
Xin KONG
;
Jingjing HAN
;
Jian ZHANG
;
Zhihong LIN
;
Jun CHEN
;
Huiying QIU
;
Depei WU
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第一医院血液内科,江苏省血液研究所,国家血液系统疾病临床医学研究中心,苏州 215006
- Keywords:
Blinatumomab;
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell;
Leukemia, B-cell lymphoblastic, acute;
Anti-tumor Immunotherapy;
Minimal residual disease
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hematology
2024;45(4):339-344
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Exploring the efficacy and safety of bridging blinatumomab (BiTE) in combination with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy for the treatment of adult patients with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) .Methods:Clinical data from 36 adult B-ALL patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University from August 2018 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 36 cases were included: 18 men and 18 women. The median age was 43.5 years (21-72 years). Moreover, 21 cases of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were reported, and 16 of these cases were relapsed or refractory. Eighteen patients underwent blinatumomab bridging followed by CAR-T cell therapy, and 18 patients received CAR-T cell therapy. This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of treatment in two groups of patients.Results:In the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group, 16 patients achieved complete remission (CR) after BiTE immunotherapy, with a CR rate of 88.9%. One month after bridging CAR-T therapy, bone marrow examination showed a CR rate of 100.0%, and the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate was higher than the nonbridging therapy group (94.4% vs. 61.1%, Fisher, P=0.041). The incidence of cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was lower than that in the nonbridging therapy group (11.1% vs. 50.0%, Fisher, P=0.027). The follow-up reveals that 13 patients continued to maintain MRD negativity, and five patients experienced relapse 8.40 months (2.57-10.20 months) after treatment. Two of five patients with relapse achieved CR after receiving the second CAR-T cell therapy. In the nonbridging therapy group, 10 patients maintained continuous MRD negativity, 7 experienced relapse, and 6 died. The 1 year overall survival rate in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was higher than that in the nonbridging therapy group, with a statistically significant difference at the 0.1 level (88.9%±10.5% vs. 66.7%±10.9%, P=0.091) . Conclusion:BiTE bridging CAR-T cell therapy demonstrates excellent efficacy in adult B-ALL treatment, with a low recent recurrence rate and ongoing assessment of long-term efficacy during follow-up.