Application of NRS 2002 and PG-SGA in perioperative nutrition assessment for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.25.012
- VernacularTitle:NRS 2002与PG-SGA在头颈部鳞癌患者围手术期营养评估中的应用比较
- Author:
Yi TU
1
;
Wanying WU
;
Guanmian LIANG
;
Lan WANG
;
Xiuhua WANG
;
Xinya ZHANG
;
Lijuan FAN
;
Xiudan XU
;
Jiaojiao CHEN
;
Changchu LIU
Author Information
1. 浙江省肿瘤医院头颈外科
- Keywords:
Nutritional screening;
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma;
Nutritional assessment;
NRS 2002;
PG-SGA
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2019;25(25):3219-3222
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective? To compare the effect of European Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) and Patient General Subjective Score (PG-SGA) in perioperative patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and to provide evidence for clinical nutritional screening in perioperative patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods? Using convenience sampling method, 82 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were admitted to the Department of Head and Neck Surgery of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from October 2015 to December 2017 during perioperative period were selected as the study subjects. NRS 2002 and PG-SGA were used to longitudinally evaluate their nutritional status at admission, 1 day before operation, 2 days after operation, 1 week after operation and at discharge, respectively. The differences of nutritional status between the two assessment tools during perioperative period were compared. Results? The trend of malnutrition risk in NRS 2002 was similar to that in PG-SAG dynamic assessment from admission to discharge, all of which were in the form of "V". The positive rate of malnutrition in PG-SAG assessment was higher than that in NRS 2002, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜ 0.01). Conclusions? NRS 2002 and PG-SGA are both suitable for nutritional risk screening of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, but the positive rate of PG-SGA is higher, which can effectively screen and evaluate the nutritional status of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, and is conducive to timely providing nutritional intervention and treatment for patients.
