Visualization study on research status of Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness in China and abroad
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.25.008
- VernacularTitle:国内外ICU获得性衰弱研究现状的可视化分析
- Author:
Yuchen WU
1
;
Guoqiang WANG
;
Nannan DING
;
Biantong JIANG
;
Zhigang ZHANG
;
Caiyun ZHANG
;
Huaping WEI
Author Information
1. 兰州大学第一医院重症医学科
- Keywords:
Bibliometrics;
Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness;
Visualization analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2019;25(25):3199-3205
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective? To analyze the relevant literatures of research on Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness(ICU-AW) by visualization analysis method based on the large data visualization analysis background, understand the current researches on ICU-AW treatment as a whole, and find out the hot spots and shortcomings of ICU-AW related researches, so as to provide reference for clinical researches. Methods? To retrieve the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, WanFang, CNKI and VIP Chinese databases from the databases' establishment data to September 1st, 2018. All published Chinese and English articles about ICU-AW were included. Endnote software was used to extract the main contents of literatures and generate co-occurrence matrix by BICOMB 2 software after manual de-duplication. Then Ucinet 6.0 was used to map the main information social network graph. Finally, gCluto 1.0 was used to draw the visualization graphs. Results? A total of 1 053 literatures were extracted. Since the publication of the first one in 1993, scholars began to pay attention to the disease in 2006. A total of 41 countries and regions all over the world had collaborative research in varying levels, of which 223 (21.18%) have been published in the United States. Up to 259 articles (24.6%) were summaries and systematic reviews, while few studies were clinical trials, observation and cohorts. Totally 48 authors participated in the publication of 10 or more papers, and the number of authors who had published one article was 2 080 (69.15%). The literatures were published in 385 journals. Only 14 journals (3.64%) contained more than 10 articles, and 450 journals (42.73%) accumulated. The citation frequency of published literatures was relatively low, and only 80 (7.60%) of them were cited more than 50 times. The visualization graph of key words showed that the research hot spots of ICU-AW included pathophysiological mechanism, diagnosis and rehabilitation treatment. Conclusions? The research on ICU-AW is still in the preliminary stage, and its depth and breadth need to be further explored. More multi-center and single-center clinical studies are needed to explore the diagnosis, related risk factors, treatment measures,prevention of ICU-AW and its impact on patients' outcomes and quality of life.
