Clinical efficacy of single-port and mini-three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity
10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20240521-00255
- VernacularTitle:单孔和小三孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效
- Author:
Fuqing ZHOU
1
;
Xin TANG
;
Yang LIU
;
Wenhui CHEN
;
Bian WU
;
Cunchuan WANG
;
Zhiyong DONG
Author Information
1. 暨南大学附属第一医院胃肠外科、减重中心，广州 510630
- Keywords:
Obesity;
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy;
Single-port laparoscopy;
Three-port laparoscopy;
Propensity score matching
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
2024;23(8):1057-1064
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of single-port and mini-three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (MTP-SG) for obesity.Methods:The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 364 obesity patients in the Chinese Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Database who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from July 2016 to December 2023 were collected. There were 79 males and 285 females, aged (31±9)years. Of 364 patients, 67 cases undergoing single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SP-SG) were divided into the SP group, and 297 cases undergoing MTP-SG were divided into the MTP group. Propensity score matching was done by the 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method. The clamp value was set as 0.1. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean± SD, and t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M( Q1, Q1), and the rank sum test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Results:(1) Propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of 364 patients, 126 cases were successfully matched, including 63 cases in the SP group and 63 cases in the MTP group. After propensity score matching, the confounding bias of gender, body mass, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist hip ratio were eliminated between the two groups. (2) Intraoperative and post-operative conditions. Both groups of patients successfully completed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. After propensity score matching, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of postoperative painkillers used, number of postoperative antiemetics used, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of total hospital stay, surgical cost, and total hospitalization cost of the 63 pati-ents in SP group were 101(90,120)minutes, 10(10,10)mL, 1.0(1.0,2.5)times, 3.0(1.0,5.0)times, 4(3,5)days, 7(5,8)days, 4.1(3.5,4.3) ten thousand yuan, and (6.4±0.8) ten thousand yuan, respectively. The above indicators of the 27 patients in MTP group were 100(90,120)minutes, 10(10,15)mL, 2.0(1.0,4.0)times, 4.0(3.0,5.0)times, 3(3,4)days, 5(5,6)days, 3.2(2.8,4.2) ten thousand yuan, and (5.8±0.8) ten thousand yuan, respectively. There were significant differences in number of postoperative antiemetics used, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of total hospital stay and total hospitalization cost between the two groups ( Z=-2.39, -3.93, -3.03, t=4.04, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of post-operative painkillers used and surgical cost between the two groups ( Z=-0.49, -1.00, -1.23, -1.47, P>0.05). (3) Follow-up. One hundred and ninety five of the 364 patients conducted postoperative 1 month follow-up, including 25 patients in the SP group and 170 patients in the MTP group, and no patient experienced complications such as gastric leakage, infection, or incisional hernia. Both groups of patients had good surgical incisions. After propensity score matching, the change in BMI (ΔBMI), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) of 24 patients in the SP group were (3.7±1.4)kg/m 2, 11.0%±3.0%, 52.6%±30.0%, respectively. The above indicators of 40 patients in the MTP group were (4.1±1.3)kg/m 2, 11.1%±2.8%, 41.8%±19.1%, respectively. Patients who conducted the postoperative 12 month follow-up were 21 and 131 in the SP group and the MTP group, respectively. After propensity score matching, the ΔBMI, %TWL and %EWL of 15 patients in the SP group were (8.7±4.1)kg/m 2, 26.2%±9.8%, 130.0%±45.1%, respectively. The above indicators of 36 patients in the MTP group were (9.8±4.0)kg/m 2, 27.2%± 8.7%, 107.1%±40.7%, respectively. Conclusion:Both SP-SG and MTP-SG can be used to treat obesity patients and achieve satisfactory short-term results.
