Effects of critical-care pain observation tool in pain assessment in resting state among patients undergoing craniotomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.04.003
- VernacularTitle:重症患者疼痛观察工具在开颅术后患者静息状态下疼痛评估中的应用效果
- Author:
Wei CAO
1
;
Cuijie YE
;
Xiaoqi HAO
;
Xiumei SUN
;
Jianxin ZHOU
;
Yuan YUAN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院重症医学科 100070
- Keywords:
Pain;
Critically ill patients;
Assessment;
Changhai pain rating scale;
Pain at rest;
Craniotomy;
Critical-care pain observation tool
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2019;25(4):400-404
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective? To explore the reliability and validity of critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) in pain assessment in resting state among neurosurgery patients undergoing craniotomy. Methods? From May 2017 to May 2018, we selected 200 neurosurgery patients undergoing craniotomy at Beijing Tiantan Hospital with the method of prospective and observational study. The Chinese version of CPOT was used to pain assessment in resting state of patients and its scores were recorded. At the same time, the Changhai Pain Rating Scale was used to pain assessment by themselves as a gold standard. We drew the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calculated the area under curve and confirmed the score of CPOT to determine the sensitivity and specificity of pain. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the reliability among CPOT reviewers. Results? A total of 200 patients undergoing craniotomy back to intensive care unit (ICU) were included including 100 patients without and 100 patients with trachea cannula. The Chinese version of CPOT had good reliability in patients between two groups with 0.857 (95%CI: 0.787-0.904) for the ICC of patients without trachea cannula and with 0.851 (95%CI: 0.778-0.899) for the ICC of patients with trachea cannula. Among patients without trachea cannula, when the cut-off value of CPOT was equal or greater than 2, CPOT showed the highest Youden index in assessing pain with 58% for the sensitivity and 86% for the specificity. Among patients with trachea cannula, the cut-off value of CPOT being equal or greater than 3 showed the highest Youden index in assessing pain with 74% for the sensitivity and 91% for the specificity. There was no statistical difference in the area under curve of pain assessed by CPOT between patients with and without trachea cannula (0.866 vs. 0.777, P＞0.05). Conclusions? CPOT has the good reliability and validity in pain assessment in resting state among neurosurgery patients undergoing craniotomy.
