An Analysis of the Contrast Patterns of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injection.
10.3344/kjp.2008.21.3.217
- Author:
Sae Young KIM
1
;
Kyung Ream HAN
;
Chan KIM
Author Information
1. Pain Clinic, CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
contrast flow;
epidural injection
- MeSH:
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome;
Fluoroscopy;
Humans;
Imidazoles;
Incidence;
Injections, Epidural;
Low Back Pain;
Lower Extremity;
Nitro Compounds;
Spinal Stenosis
- From:The Korean Journal of Pain
2008;21(3):217-223
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Lumbar transforaminal epidural injections (LTEIs) have been utilized in the treatment of radicular pain, and LTEIs have the advantage of target-specificity. However, there have not been enough studies on the contrast patterns in LTEIs with using fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the spreading epidural contrast patterns that are seen during real-time fluoroscopic guided LTEIs. METHODS: A total of 131 patients who underwent fluoroscopic guided LTEIs were studied. The inclusion criteria were those patients with low back pain and/or lower extremity pain that was caused by a herniated nucleus pulposus, lumbar spinal stenosis, failed back surgery syndrome, and herpes zoster-associated pain. We classified the contrast patterns in regard to the contrast flow spreading to the nerve root and/or the unilateral, bilateral or cylinderic type of epidural spreading on the AP view of the fluoroscopy and the ventral or dorsal epidural filling on the lateral view. In addition to the pattern analysis, we evaluated the range of contrast spreading from the cranial to the caudal epidural filling and the incidence of an intravascular flow pattern. RESULTS: Epidural spreading was seen in 126 cases (96.2%) of the total patients through the nerve root. Ventral spreading occurred in 120 cases (95.2%). On the AP view, a nerve root with unilateral, bilateral and cylinderic epidural filling was noted for 108 (85.7%), 9 (7.1%) and 9 (7.1%) cases, respectively. The contrast spreading to vertebral segments was smaller for the patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and failed back surgery syndrome than for the other groups (P < 0.0083). The incidence of intravascular injection was 11.1% (14/126). CONCLUSIONS: LTEIs using fluoroscopic visualization provided excellent assessment of the ventral epidural filling as well as nerve root filling. However, unilateral epidural spreading was prominent for the LTEIs.
