Bibliometric study of Chinese literature on the occupational quality of nursing assistant for the aged
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.32.011
- VernacularTitle:养老护理员职业素质中文文献计量学研究
- Author:
Junxian XU
1
;
Xiaoqin MA
Author Information
1. 314001,嘉兴学院医学院护理系
- Keywords:
Nursing assistant for aged;
Occupational quality;
Bibliometric analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2017;23(32):4107-4111
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the status quo of the occupational quality of the nursing assistant for the aged by bibliometric analysis.Methods We searched literatures on occupational quality of nursing assistant published in CNKI and Wanfang Data knowledge service platform from January 2000 to December 2016. We set up a database and analyzed the title, author, year, province of first author, organization of first author, fund assistance, citation, research contents, etc.Results A total of 94 papers were included, including 76 periodicals and 18 master's theses, and the number of literature showed an upward trend; the first author came from 16 provinces, 3 municipalities directly under the central government and 1 autonomous regions; institutions of traditional Chinese medicine accounted for the largest proportion, accounting for 84.04%; 53 literatures (55.79%) were provided with fund assistance; 59 literatures were completed by cooperation of 2 or more persons, making the coauthoring rate of 62.77% and literature cooperation degree was 2.85 (268/94); The citations of 79 papers were less than 10 times, of which there were totally 52 (55.32%) not being quoted or being quoted once; the research contents covered a wide range of subjects, including occupational quality training, occupational quality research, and others, accounting for 45.74%, 31.91% and 15.96% respectively. Conclusions The number of literatures on occupational quality of nursing assistant for the aged are increasing. There are differences in the number of literatures between different regions and organizations, with high fund subsidy rate, cooperation degree and low cited frequency. Research contents need to be further expanded and innovated.
