Retrospective analysis of risk factors of liver cirrhosis combined with overt hepatic encephalopathy: a single -center case-control study
10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200708-00378
- VernacularTitle:肝硬化合并显性肝性脑病危险因素的回顾性分析：一项单中心病例对照研究
- Author:
Yanan FAN
1
;
Tongtong JI
;
Rongyue LIANG
;
Yanyan YU
;
Jinghang XU
Author Information
1. 北京大学第一医院感染疾病科 100034
- Keywords:
Liver cirrhosis;
Hepatic encephalopathy;
Risk factors;
Retrospective study
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatology
2021;29(2):133-136
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the risk factors of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in patients with liver cirrhosis.Methods:A retrospective study was designed. Patients with liver cirrhosis combined with /without OHE who were hospitalized to our hospital during the same period were selected as the case/control group. Clinical and laboratory data of both groups of patients were compared to analyze the risk factors affecting the occurrence of OHE. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. A t-test or rank-sum test was used to compare the measurement data. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact probability method was used to compare the count data. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.Results:A total of 500 patients with liver cirrhosis diagnosed in our hospital from August 2017 to December 2018 were selected as the case group, and 40 cases with cirrhosis without OHE who were hospitalized during the same period were randomly selected as the control group. The gender composition and age of the case and control group were comparable. Viral hepatitis (mainly hepatitis B) was the main etiology of liver cirrhosis in both groups. There were 52.5% patients in the case group and 57.5% patients in the control group, respectively. Alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune liver disease and so on were the other included causes. With regard to blood biochemical indicators, the serum creatinine levels of both groups were comparable, but in the case group, the serum total bilirubin level was higher (34.30 μmol / L vs. 18.65 μ mol/L, Z = -3.185, P < 0.05), while the serum sodium level was lower (137.00 mmol/L vs. 140.08 mmol/L, Z = -2.348, P < 0.05), and the prothrombin time was longer (14.60 s vs. 12.20 s) s. 078, P < 0.05), and international normalized ratio (1.33 vs. 1.07, Z = - 5.632, P < 0.05), and serum albumin level (30.6 g/L vs. 35.6 g/L, t = 3.386, P < 0.05) was lower. In terms of complications, patients in the case group had a higher proportion of combined gastrointestinal bleeding (30.0% vs. 10.0%, χ 2 = 5.000, P < 0.05), ascites (87.5% vs. 30.0%, χ 2 = 27.286, P < 0.05) and secondary infection (32.5% vs. 10.0%, χ 2 = 7.813, P < 0.05). In terms of severity classification, the proportion of Child-Pugh C in the case group was higher (62.5% vs. 10.0%, χ 2 =26.593, P < 0.05). In terms of outcome, there were 3 deaths in the case group and no deaths in the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh class C ( OR = 12.696), and combined ascites ( OR = 10.655) were an independent risk factor for OHE in patients with liver cirrhosis. Conclusion:Our single-center retrospective clinical study shows that patients with cirrhosis combined with OHE are more critical and have more complications. In order to promptly diagnose and treat OHE, more attention should be paid to patients with combined ascites and Child-Pugh class C.
