Nursing strategy of national free progestation eugenic health examination
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.22.012
- VernacularTitle:国家免费孕前优生健康体检中的护理对策
- Author:
Xiaoxian WEN
1
;
Jianwen LIANG
;
Huichu CHEN
;
Lianfen CHEN
;
Xiaoxiao LONG
;
Fengyi CHEN
;
Xiaomei CHEN
Author Information
1. 511400,广州市番禺区妇幼保健计划生育服务中心
- Keywords:
Preconception care;
Prenatal and postnatal care;
Physical examination;
Nursing intervention;
Congenital defect fetus;
Reproductive age women
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2017;23(22):2876-2881
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of nursing intervention of national free progestation eugenic health examination on service objects planned to pregnancy.Methods A total of 872 couples in Panyu District of Guangzhou were selected from January 2014 to January 2016 based on convenient sampling. All of them complied with family planning policy, planned to pregnancy and received national free progestation eugenic health examination. The participants were divided into control group (n=436) and observation group (n=436) according to the method of lottery. The control group received national free eugenic health examination, and the observation group received additional nursing care and comprehensive guidance based on the control group. The distribution of high-risk factors of the couples was recorded. The knowledge of birth defects and progestational eugenics and the pregnancy outcomes were observed.Results There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of reproductive tract infection, pre-pregnancy virus screening, abnormal pre-pregnancy laboratory findings, adverse pregnancy outcome, family history of high risk, wife/husband environmental exposure, and other high-risk factors between two groups (P>0.05). There were significant differences in health and nutrition during pregnancy, the optimal reproductive age, the importance of progestation examination, the normal physiological process of pregnancy, the time of folic acid supplementation, and the prevention of birth defects between two groups (P<0.05). The observation group had significantly higher normal pregnancy rate and lower miscarriage and stillbirth rate compared with the control group (95.15% vs. 85.82% for normal pregnancy; 2.99% vs. 13.42% for miscarriage; 0.75% vs. 1.87% for stillbirth;P<0.05).Conclusions Nursing intervention in progestation eugenic health examination can effectively improve the eugenic knowledge, attitude and behavior, and the outcome of pregnancy. It can reduce the risk of birth defects.
