Network Meta-analysis of the effects of different interactive modes of intervention on the rehabilitation of stroke patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20240316-00594
- VernacularTitle:不同互动模式干预对脑卒中患者康复效果影响的网状Meta分析
- Author:
Shui LIU
1
;
Fengling WANG
;
Tiantian JIA
;
Yunfen SUN
Author Information
1. 山东第二医科大学护理学院，潍坊 261000
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Interactive mode;
Rehabilitation;
Meta analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2024;40(31):2413-2421
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effects of different interaction modes on the rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients, and to provide reference for caregivers to choose the best interaction mode according to the rehabilitation goals.Methods:Computerized search of Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interaction modes to improve rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients was performed from the year of database construction to January 8, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, and extracted data from them. Stata16.0 was used for a network meta-analysis.Results:A total of 22 articles were included that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, involving 2 404 patients and 5 interaction modes, namely Cox health behavior interaction mode, doctor-patient interaction mode, King interaction compliance mode, dual track interaction mode, and online interaction mode. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that in terms of improving self-care ability, the King interaction model [ SMD(95% CI)=0.25(0.05-0.45)], the network interaction model [ SMD(95% CI)=0.27(0.07-0.48)], and the Cox health behavior interaction model [ SMD(95% CI)=0.37(0.07-0.67)] were all superior to conventional nursing (all P<0.05). In terms of improving motor function, except for the dual track interactive mode, all other modes were superior to conventional nursing ( SMD values were -0.52--0.30, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the application effects of different modes in improving the quality of life (all P>0.05). The ranking results of the area under the cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) for improving self-care ability, motor fuction and quality of life were Cox health behavior interaction mode (SUCRA=83.7%), doctor-patient interaction mode (SUCRA=89.5%) and King interaction standard mode (SUCRA=78.2%). Conclusions:The Cox health behavior interaction model can improve the self-care ability of stroke patients, the doctor-patient interaction model can improve the motor function of stroke patients, and the King interaction standard model may have more advantages in improving the quality of life of stroke patients. It is suggested to combine the advantages of the three to maximize the rehabilitation effect of stroke patients.
