The influence of different teaching modes in the creativity of nursing students in China: a network Meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20240519-01267
- VernacularTitle:不同种教育模式对我国护理专业学生创新能力影响的网状Meta分析
- Author:
Junya ZHAO
1
;
Junting SHANG
;
Yan CHEN
;
Xueqing SONG
;
Cuiping XU
Author Information
1. 山东大学护理与康复学院，济南 250012
- Keywords:
Students, nursing;
Teaching;
Creativity;
Network Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2024;40(31):2401-2412
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the influence of different teaching modes in the creativity of nursing students in China.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and VIP Database were carried out. Randomized control trials (RCTs) examining the influence of different teaching modes in the creativity of nursing students were included from inception to March 5, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and combined with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), then network Meta-analysis with random effects was performed by using WinBugs 1.4.3 and Stata 17.0 software.Results:A total of 63 studies involving 22 teaching modes were included. The network Meta-analysis showed that Case-based Learning Mode, Evidence-based Nursing Teaching Mode, 3D Printing Model Teaching Mode, Hands-on Inquiry Based Learning, Quality Control Circle Teaching Mode, Six Thinking Hats Teaching Mode, Theory, Drill, Practice, Combine (TDPC, T:theory; D:drill; P:practice; C:combine) Teaching Mode were more effective than Lecture-based Learning Mode ( SMD values were 4.61-22.51, all P<0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed the effectiveness of TDPC Teaching Mode was the greatest in nursing theoretical teaching[surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA)=98.08%], the Quality Control Circle Teching Mode was the second most effective (SUCRA=83.13%). The effectiveness of Six Thinking Hats Teaching Mode was the greatest in nursing practical teaching (SUCRA=95.73%), followed by the 3D Printing Model Teching Mode (SUCRA=86.97%). Conclusions:TDPC Teaching Mode, Six Thinking Hats Teaching Mode, 3D Printing Model, Quality Control Circle Teaching Mode were superior to other teaching modes in improving creativity of nursing students.
