Differential study on intra-abdominal pressure measurement in severe patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with prone position integrated treatment at different positions
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20240117-00158
- VernacularTitle:体外膜肺氧合联合俯卧位一体化治疗的重症患者不同体位测量腹内压的差异性研究
- Author:
Jinyan YI
1
;
Li YANG
;
Bohua ZHONG
;
Haibin LUO
;
Enhui GUO
;
Mingshang WEI
Author Information
1. 广西医科大学第一附属医院重症医学科，南宁 530021
- Keywords:
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
Prone position;
Intra-abdominal pressure;
Measurement
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2024;40(27):2081-2089
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare and analyze the differences in the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in different positions of critically ill patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) combined with prone position integration, with a view to finding a more optimal intra-abdominal pressure monitoring strategy, which can provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods:Forty critically ill patients who underwent ECMO combined with prone position integrated treatment in the department of Intensive Care Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method using an own-control trial. The differences in intra-abdominal pressure between supine position with head elevated at 0°, 15°and 30°and prone position with head high and foot low slopes at 0°, 15°and 30°were compared and analyzed. Heart rate, respiration, mean arterial pressure and oxygen saturation were also compared in patients in different positions.Results:There were 29 males and 11 females in 40 patients with the age of (62.58 ± 17.99) years.The intra-abdominal pressure in supine position with head elevated at 30° was (12.45 ± 3.43) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), which was higher than that of 0° and 15° of (9.38 ± 2.52) and (10.70 ± 2.95) mmHg, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=4.56, 2.45, both P<0.05);the difference in intra-abdominal pressure between 0° and 15° was not statistically significant ( P>0.05); the intra-abdominal pressure in prone position with head-high-foot-low slope of 30° was (12.92 ± 4.19) mmHg, which was higher than that of 0°and 15°of (9.67 ± 2.80), and (11.01 ± 3.10) mmHg, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=4.08, 2.32, both P<0.05); the difference in intra-abdominal pressure between 0° and 15° was not statistically significant ( P>0.05).The differences in intra-abdominal pressure between groups of supine bed head elevation 0°, 15°, 30°and prone position with head high and foot low slopes 0°, 15°, 30°were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The differences in heart rate, respiration, mean arterial pressure and oxygen saturation in the supine position with head elevated at 0°, 15°and 30° were not statistically significant when compared within groups (all P>0.05); the differences in heart rate, respiration, mean arterial pressure and oxygen saturation in the prone position with head elevated with feet and feet on low slopes at 0°, 15°and 30°were not statistically significant when compared within groups (all P>0.05); and the differences in supine position with head elevated at 0°, 15°, 30°and prone head-height-foot-low slope 0°, 15°, 30°of heart rate, respiration, mean arterial pressure were not statistically significant (all P>0.05); supine bed head elevation 0°, 15°, 30°and prone head-height-foot-low slope 0°, 15°, 30°of oxygen saturation between the groups, the differences were statistically significant ( Z=6.85, 6.82, 6.68, all P<0.05). Conclusions:Intra-abdominal pressure can be measured in the 15° prone position in critically ill patients treated with ECMO combined with prone position integration; the different positions have little effect on vital signs, but the prone position significantly improves oxygen saturation.
