Neonatal in-hospital outcomes and follow-up in pregnancies with aortic dissection
10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20240116-00032
- VernacularTitle:合并主动脉夹层孕妇分娩新生儿院内结局及随访
- Author:
Ziwen ZHAO
1
;
Yun DONG
;
Tieying ZHANG
;
Xingkun LI
;
Guiying LIU
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院儿科，北京 100029
- Keywords:
Aortic dissection;
Pregnant;
Infant, newborn;
In-hospital outcome;
Follow-up
- From:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
2024;39(9):655-659
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the short-term and long-term effects of pregnancy with aortic dissection (AD) on newborns.Methods:In this retrospective cohort study, 31 live births of pregnant women with AD admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2010 to June 2022 were selected as the AD group.Among them, 19 preterm births were in the preterm AD group.Additionally, 100 neonates delivered by pregnant women without pregnancy complications were selected as the normal control group, and 50 preterm infants delivered by pregnant women without pregnancy complications were selected as the preterm control group during the same period.The differences between the AD group and the normal control group, and between the preterm AD group and the preterm control group were compared using the independent samples t-test, Chi-square test, and Fisher′s exact test.Patients in the AD group were followed up for 5 years. Results:(1) The incidence rates of small for gestational age (SGA) (12.90% vs. 1.00%), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) (16.13% vs. 2.00%), digestive tract hemorrhage (16.13% vs. 1.00%), nervous system disease (16.13% vs. 1.00%), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (12.90% vs. 0), premature infant (61.29% vs. 5.00%), asphyxia (35.48% vs. 1.00%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (64.52% vs. 1.00%), respiratory support (38.71% vs. 2.00%), transfer to the department of pediatrics within 24 hours of birth (90.32% vs. 13.00%), caesarean section (100% vs. 25.00%), and low birth weight infant (38.71% vs. 2.00%) in the AD group were significantly higher than those in the normal control group, while the gestational age[(34.90±2.80) weeks vs. (38.87±1.50) weeks], length [(45.65±3.56) cm vs. (50.17±0.81) cm], and weight [(2 456.77±634.02) g vs. (3 383.90±413.05) g] were significantly less than those in the normal control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).(2) The gestational age [(33.26±2.31) weeks vs. (34.80±1.29) weeks], length [(43.89±3.36) cm vs. (46.64±2.89) cm], and weight [(2 158.95±558.92) g vs. (2 418.20±431.20) g] in the preterm AD group were less than those in the preterm control group, while the incidence rates of NRDS (26.32% vs. 4.00%), digestive tract hemorrhage (21.05% vs. 4.00%), nervous system disease (26.32% vs. 6.00%), MODS (21.05% vs. 2.00%), caesarean section (100% vs. 52.00%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (73.68% vs. 8.00%), respiratory support (63.16% vs. 10.00%), and asphyxia (47.37% vs. 2.00%) were significantly higher than those in the preterm control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).(3) Twenty-seven cases in the AD group survived, and 4 cases were lost to follow-up.Among them, 9 cases had abnormal physical development, 3 cases had eye disease, and 1 case was mentally retarded.None of them underwent genetic detection. Conclusions:Neonates born to mothers with AD in pregnancy have poor physical development, high incidence of complications, and reduced quality of life, and need long-term monitoring and follow-up in their growth and development.
