Comparative Evaluation of Detection Performance of Four Blood Culture Systems for Common Pathogens and Antibiotic Absorption Capacity in Clinical Laboratory
10.3969/j.issn.1671-7414.2024.05.037
- VernacularTitle:临床实验室四种血培养瓶对常见病原菌检出效率及抗生素吸附能力实验比较
- Author:
Yahua RAO
1
;
Min JIA
;
Yongtao WANG
;
Zhimin HU
;
Jiajia GAO
Author Information
1. 武汉市第一医院医学检验科,武汉 430022
- Keywords:
blood culture;
pathogens;
antibiotic adsorption;
positive detection rate;
time to detection
- From:
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
2024;39(5):199-204
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the detection performance of common strains and the antimicrobial binding capacity of four blood culture systems made by BMX-FA/N Plus,Zhengzhou Anto,Zhuhai DIER and Chongqing Zhongyuan.Methods According to the common pathogens of clinical bloodstream infections in Wuhan No.1 Hospital,ATCC standard isolates of Staphylococcus aureus,Streptococcus pneumoniae,Enterococcus faecalis,Escherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Haemophilus influenzae,Stenotrophomonas Maltophil,Bacteroides tenuis and Candida glabla were chosen to explore.Prefabricated bacterial suspension and sterile horse blood were injected into different brands of blood culture systems to simulate the blood samples of patients with non-antibiotic treatment and antibiotic treatment.Six commonly used clinical antibiotics,Imipenem,Piperacillin/Tazobactam,Cefoperazone/Sulbactam,Levofloxacin,Vancomycin and Micafungine,were added to the blood samples after simulated antibiotic treatment.The performance was evaluated by recording the positive bottles and the detection time of each brand culture systems within five days with and without antibiotic.Results In the absence of antibiotic,four blood culture systems showed 100％recovery on all of the pathogens.Staphylococcus aureus,Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae were recovered earlier in DIER aerobic bottles than BMX-FA Plus aerobic bottles,and the differences were statistically significant(t=2.608,5.547,12.247,all P＜0.05).The time to detection of Staphylococcus aureus,Streptococcus pneumoniae,Enterococcus faecalis and Haemophilus influenzae in Zhongyuan anaerobic bottles was significantly faster than that of BMX-FA Plus anaerobic bottles,with an average shortening of 1.92～10.80 h,and the differences were statistically significant(t=30.187,5.367,33.068,24.855,all P＜0.05).When antibiotics added,BMX-FA Plus culture bottle showed 100％recovery to all the detecting pathogens with the peak concentration antibiotics except Cefoperazone/Sulbactam,while the recovery in Zhongyuan blood culture bottle also was 100％with peak concentration antibiotics of Piperacillin/Tazobactam,Levofloxacin and Micafunzin.The peak concentration of imipenem antibiotics in domestic bottles was only detected in Anto anaerobic bottles,with lower positive detection rate(66.7％)lower than that of BMX-FA Plus(100％)and a later detection,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-21.000,P=0.030).Conclusion In the absence of antibiotic interference,the positive detection rate of the above pathogens are the same for four blood culture systems,and the time to detection of DIER and Zhongyuan systems is shorter than that of BMX-FA/N Plus.In the presence of antibiotic interference,the detection ability to pathogens in BMX-FA/N Plus system is the best,followed by domestic Zhongyuan system.
