Comparative study on curative effects of three different fumigating and washing methods in patients after hemorrhoidectomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.32.013
- VernacularTitle:不同熏洗方式对混合痔术后疗效影响的比较研究
- Author:
Shuxia YAN
1
;
Cuiyun YIN
;
Yongsheng GE
;
Jinfang ZHANG
;
Yanping WANG
;
Guihua XU
Author Information
1. 210023,南京中医药大学护理学院
- Keywords:
Mixed hemorrhoid;
Pain;
Fumigating and washing therapy;
Wound healing;
Around anus edema
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2016;22(32):4634-4637
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the curative effect of fumigating and washing therapy with Chinese medicine bath,sitz bath and flushing method in patients after hemorrhoidectomy.Methods A total of 180 patients with henorrhoidectomy were selected as the research object and participated in the research in Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM and Jiangsu Hospital of integrated TCM and western medicine.According to random number table,they were assigned to the bath group,the sits bath group and the flushing group,with 60 cases in each group and 30 cases in each research center.The pain after surgery,around anus edema and intertion status of wounds in three groups were compared.Results The results showed that the scores of postoperative pain were gradually decreased.The score of postoperative pain at 7th day was (2.32±0.82) points in the flushing group;(2.65±0.04) points in the bath group,and (3.05±0.02) points in the sitz bath group (P＜0.05).The difference of pain scores at other time was not significant (P＞0.05).No significant difference in around anus edema and intertion status of wounds among three groups (P＞0.05).Conclusions Chinese medicine flushing therapy offers a better pain relief than sitz bath and bath method.There are no significant differences in shorting the time of wound healing and reducing the around anus edema.
