Effect of open-ended venous port with different sealing fluids to seal tube
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.31.033
- VernacularTitle:末端开口静脉输液港使用不同封管液封管效果比较
- Author:
Jia ZHANG
1
;
Keli YAN
;
Min WEI
;
Shanshan WU
Author Information
1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤科
- Keywords:
Open-ended venous port;
Pre-flushed flushing syringes;
Heparin saline;
Catheter occlusion rate
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2016;22(31):4565-4567
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of tube sealing using pre-flushed flushing syringes ( flush) and heparin saline on open-ended port for venous transfusion during continuous infusion. Methods During the period of continuous intravenous infusion, a total 90 tumor patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. They used open-ended port for venous transfusion and was sealed by using pre-flushed flushing syringes and 100 U/ml heparin saline respectively. The catheter blockage rate, dispensing time, sealing tube time and cost of single sealing tube were compared between two groups.Results During the period of continuous infusion, the catheter occlusion rate of flush group and the heparin saline group were 1.84% and 1.47% (χ2=0.2642,P>0.05); on the dispensing and seal tube time,they were (11.5±2.9) seconds and (10.5±2.6) seconds in the flash group, and (37.1±2.9) seconds and (24.6±3.3) seconds in the heparin saline group (t=41.982,22.797;P<0.01). The cost for flush sealing is 8.33 yuan lower than that of heparin saline sealing.Conclusions During the period of continuous intravenous infusion, sealing tube by using flush on open-ended infusion port is safe and effective. The workload of the nurses and cost is reduced, it is worth to be promoted.
