Influence of five?in?one management mode on disease prevention and control of school children with asthma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578?1310.2019.11.011
- VernacularTitle:五位一体管理模式对学龄期哮喘患儿疾病防控的影响
- Author:
Ling LU
1
;
Rongjun LIN
;
Renzheng GUAN
;
Yujuan LIU
;
Xiuyan WANG
Author Information
1. 青岛大学附属医院综合儿科266000
- Keywords:
Asthma;
Child;
Disease management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
2019;57(11):870-875
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To investigate the influence of five?in?one management mode (standardized asthma treatment, asthma diary, peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring, reasonable diet and physical exercise) on disease prevention and control of school children with asthma. Methods From April to October 2018, 70 children with asthma in clinical remission were selected from Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University using randomized controlled study design. These children were randomly divided into study group and control group, with 35 cases in each group. In the study group, 5 cases were lost to follow?up, and 30 cases were actually enrolled. In the control group, 6 cases were lost to follow?up, and 29 cases were actually enrolled. Children in the control group received routine medication and regular outpatient consultation, and children in the study group received the five?in?one asthma management model. In the first time of seeing a doctor, after 3 months and 6 months of follow?up, asthma control test score, medication compliance index score and lung function index (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), PEF were evaluated respectively. Parental satisfaction, asthma acute episodes, weight, height and biochemical index were recorded during the 6 months of follow?up. Pulmonary function index, asthma control score and body mass index of overweight children with asthma were compared with t-test, medication compliance was compared with chi?square test, and the rank sum test was used for the comparison of the number of emergency visits of asthma attacks and parents'satisfaction. Results A total of 59 children with asthma were included, among them 30 were in the study group (8.1 ± 1.5) years old and 29 in the control group (9.2±1.1) years old. After 3 months of follow?up, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score in the study group were (86.3 ± 1.5)% , (83.3 ± 2.4)% , (24.7 ± 2.6) points respectively; and in the control group, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score were (84.4±2.5)%, (82.2±1.9)%, (21.1±1.3) points respectively. The indicators in the study group were higher than those in the control group (t=3.62, 1.97, 6.64, P<0.05). After 6 months of follow?up, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score in the study group were (88.4±2.3)%, (85.4±2.2)%, (26.8±1.8) points respectively; and in the control group, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score were (85.5±1.9)%, (83.2± 1.7)%, (22.5±1.4) points respectively. The indicators in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (t=5.34, 4.24, 10.41, P<0.05). During the 6?month follow up, the number of emergency visits of asthma attacks in the study group and in the control group were 0.42(0.36, 0.51) and 0.92(0.72, 1.27) respectively. The indicator in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Z=3.21, P<0.05). After 3 months of follow?up, the proportions of children with good compliance in the study group and control group were 67% (20/30) and 62% (18/29), the proportions of poor compliance were 27% (8/30) and 34% (10/29), the proportions of non?compliance were 7% (2/30) and 7% (2/29). There were no statistically significant differences (χ2=0.14, 0.43, 0.00, P=0.71, 0.51, 0.97). After 6 months of follow?up, the proportions of children with good compliance in the study group and control group were 87% (26/30) and 69% (20/29), the proportion of poor compliance were 10% (3/30) and 28% (8/29), the proportion of non?compliance were 3% (1/30) and 7% (2/29), There were no statistically significant differences (χ2=2.70, 3.00, 0.39, P=0.10, 0.08, 0.53). After 6 months of follow?up, the number of great satisfaction, satisfaction and dissatisfaction in the study group were 20, 10 and 0 respectively, the satisfaction rate was 100%, meanwhile those indicators in the control group were 4, 15 and 10 respectively, the satisfaction rate was 66%, The indicator in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (Z=4.60, P<0.05). Conclusions The application of "five?in?one" asthma management model (standardized asthma treatment, asthma diary, PEF monitoring, reasonable diet and physical exercise) for school?age children with asthma can significantly improve lung function, as well as reduce the number of acute asthma attacks. It has a high parent satisfaction, therefore it should be recommended for clinical implementation.
