Quality evaluation of literature of randomized controlled trials on oral hydration for prevention of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in China
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.22.019
- VernacularTitle:国内口服水化治疗预防冠脉介入术后急性肾损伤随机对照试验文献质量评析
- Author:
Ruoya JIA
1
;
Yun CHANG
;
Tianyi HUANG
Author Information
1. 210006 南京医科大学附属南京医院 南京市第一医院 护理部
- Keywords:
Randomized controlled trial;
Percutaneous coronary intervention;
Oral hydration;
Acute kidney injury;
Literature quality evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2016;22(22):3181-3184
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To understand the quality of literature of randomized controlled trials( RCTs) on oral hydration for prevention of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention published( PCI) in journals in China.Methods Literature of RCTs on oral hydration for prevention of acute kidney injury after PCI published in journals in China was searched in CBM, CNKI, Wan Fang data, and VIP database. And then, they were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Besides, the quality of literature was evaluated based on the Cochrane collaboration′s tool for assessing risk of bias and the Jadad scale. Results A total of 10 RCTs were included. The results of the Cochrane collaboration′s tool for assessing risk of bias showed that there was no document to describe whether the data of subjects without completing the trail were analyzed with intentional analysis, random allocation concealment, blinding of participants and outcome assessment and so on. Moreover, the score of Jadad was less than two. There was only one document which mentioned the word‘random’ without involving specific randomized methods, one document which explained the blind method, no document which reported the case that withdrew from the trail and was lost.Conclusions The quality of literature of RCTs on oral hydration for prevention of acute kidney injury after PCI published in journals in China is low. Because of this, high quality researches should be conducted so as to provide good guidance for clinical practice.
