Application of PRAME immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas
10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20230908-00156
- VernacularTitle:黑色素瘤优先表达抗原免疫组织化学染色在子宫内膜癌及宫颈腺癌鉴别诊断中的应用
- Author:
Xiao WEI
1
;
Zhong ZHENG
;
Qianyun SHI
;
Chaoshan WANG
;
Fanqing MENG
;
Ling CHEN
Author Information
1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院病理科，南京 210008
- Keywords:
Uterine neoplasms;
Immunohistochemistry;
Diagnosis, differential;
Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pathology
2024;53(6):552-556
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemical staining in differential diagnosis of primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.Methods:Eighty‐seven cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma and sixty-three cases of cervical adenocarcinoma were collected from May 2018 to November 2023 in the Department of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School and all the cases were subject to PRAME immunohistochemical staining. The difference of PRAME expression between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas was analyzed.Results:In 87 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma, patients′ age ranged from 35 to 71 years (average 59 years, median 59 years); in 63 cases of cervical adenocarcinoma patients′ age ranged from 28 to 80 years (average 49 years, median 47 years). Seventy‐eight cases (78/87, 89.7%) of endometrial adenocarcinoma; 2 cases (2/63, 3.2%) of cervical adenocarcinoma showed positive PRAME staining, and both cases of cervical adenocarcinoma were clear cell carcinoma. The sensitivity and specificity of PRAME in distinguishing between endometrial and cervical adenocarcinoma in the cohort were 89.7% and 96.8%, while those in differentiating non-clear cell carcinoma of the uterus from that of the cervix reached up to 91% and 100%, respectively.Conclusions:Immunohistochemical staining for PRAME demonstrates statistically significant differences between endometrial and cervical carcinomas, making it a useful auxiliary diagnostic marker for differentiating cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma, especially non-clear cell carcinoma.
