Effect of enteral nutrition support on quality of life and therapeutic effect in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn115807-20240508-00156
- VernacularTitle:肠内营养支持对转移性结直肠癌患者生存质量及疗效的影响分析
- Author:
Cheng ZHAO
1
;
Lina HU
;
Hui YU
;
Cui BAI
;
Jiqing HAO
Author Information
1. 南京鼓楼医院集团安庆市石化医院肿瘤内科，安庆 246002
- Keywords:
Enteral nutrition;
Colorectal cancer;
Nutrition;
Quality of life
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2024;18(4):578-582
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of enteral nutrition support on quality of life and therapeutic effect in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods:A total of 100 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer admitted to Anqing Petrochemical Hospital from Jan. 2020 to Dec. 2023 were selected and divided into parenteral nutrition group and enteral+parenteral nutrition group with 50 cases each using random number table method. The parenteral nutrition group received parenteral nutrition, and the parenteral + parenteral nutrition group was supplemented with enteral nutrition. The therapeutic effect, nutritional indexes, intestinal flora, survival time and quality of life before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results:The effective rate of enteral + off-site nutrition group was 76.00%, that of parenteral nutrition group was 54.00%, and that of enteral + off-site nutrition group was higher than that of parenteral nutrition group ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in nutritional indexes, flora imbalance grade or QLQ-C30 score between the two groups before intervention ( P>0.05). After the intervention, the albumin and total protein in the enteral + parenteral nutrition group were (38.76±6.02) g/L, (64.09±6.71) g/L, the number of normal microbiota disorder cases was 46, the survival time was (17.055±4.33) months, the physical function score was (74.59±7.55) points, and the emotional function score was (78.94±7.96) points, cognitive function score (88.95±9.03) points, role function score (85.49±8.61) points, social function score (81.45±8.27) points. In the parenteral nutrition group, the albumin was (34.51±5.47) g/L, the total protein was (58.91±6.55) g/L, the number of normal microbiota disorder cases was 33, the survival time was (12.48±3.59) months, the physical function score was (67.21±6.81) points, and the emotional function score was (73.55±7.78) points, cognitive function score was (83.47±8.55) points, role function score was (80.14±8.26) points, social function score was (76.93±7.827) points, and enteral + off-site nutrition group was higher than parenteral nutrition group ( P<0.05). In the enteral + off-site nutrition group, the transferrin was (1.45±0.57) g/L, and there were 2 cases of class II flora dysregulation and 2 cases of class III flora dysregulation; in the off-site nutrition group, the transferrin was (1.71±0.61) g/L, and the number of class II flora dysregulation was 8 cases and the number of class III flora dysregulation was 9 cases. Enteral + off-site nutrition group was lower than parenteral nutrition group ( P<0.05) . Conclusion:Enteral + parenteral nutrition support Enteral nutrition support can help improve the treatment effect of metastatic colorectal cancer, improve the nutritional status and survival time of patients, and improve the quality of life of patients.
