Differences analysis of invasive and non-invasive blood pressure in patients with hypertension and stroke:a Meta analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2015.33.012
- VernacularTitle:高血压及休克患者有创与无创血压差异性的Meta分析
- Author:
Yujiao WANG
1
;
Lan GAO
;
Shiyan SUN
;
Chunjing LI
Author Information
1. 吉林大学第一医院神经内科N-ICU
- Keywords:
Hypertension;
Shock;
Invasive blood pressure;
Non-invasive blood pressure;
Meta analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2015;21(33):4014-4016
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the best method of monitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertensive or shock. Methods According to the meta-analysis of the studies that compared records the of the invasive and noninvasive blood pressure of the hypertensive and shock patients in Chinese medical journals published, through the Revman5. 1 for metaanalysis. Results The hypertension group had totally retrieved 6 articles, and Meta analysis showed the systolic pressure was WMD=18. 08,95%CI=13. 75-2. 40, and NBP had difference with IBP in systolic pressure that the blood pressure of IBP method was higher than that of NBP;after U test, P <0. 000 1. The diastolic was WMD =4. 36, 95% CI = -2. 963-11. 68 and there was no statistically significant in difference of two methods to measure diastolic pressure. The stroke group was totally retrieved 9 randomized trails with diastolic blood pressure WMD= -13. 79, 95%CI= -16. 7--10. 88 and systolic blood pressure WMD= -8. 67, 95%CI= -10. 53--6. 81; both NBP of diastolic and systolic blood pressure were higher than that of IBP;after U test, P<0. 000 1. Conclusions IBP can reflect the change of hypertension and stroke dynamically, so it can save value time of rescue in clinical.
