A short-time non-randomized controlled clinical study on adjunctive photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis
10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.06.003
- VernacularTitle:光动力疗法辅助治疗种植体周炎的短期非随机对照临床研究
- Author:
Yiwei WANG
1
;
Rong SHU
;
Yufeng XIE
;
Jielei QIAN
;
Zhikai LIN
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院牙周病科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海(200011)
- Keywords:
photodynamic therapy;
peri-implantitis;
mechanical debridement
- From:
STOMATOLOGY
2024;44(6):414-420
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy(PDT)assisted mechanical debridement(MD)in the treatment of peri-implantitis.Methods According to the new international classification of periodontal diseases and peri-implant diseases in 2018,single tooth implants diagnosed as peri-implantitis were included.Before treatment,the probing depth(PD),modified sulcus bleeding index(mSBI),and modified plaque index(mPLI)were recorded as the baseline,with mSBI≥1 sites as the treatment sites.The MD group was a control group,and only mechanical subgingival debridement was performed.The PDT group was treated with photodynamic therapy twice,immediately after subgingival debridement and one week after.Follow-up was ar-ranged at 6 and 12 weeks after the end of treatment to examine the changes in PD,mSBI,and mPLI at the included implant treatment sites.Results A total of 35 patients were included in this study,with 38 teeth affected by peri-implantitis and 154 treatment sites.The PDT group and MD group included 20 and 18 implants respectively,with a total of 78 treatment sites included in the PDT group,51 sites with PD≥6 mm,and 27 sites with PD＜6 mm.A total of 76 treatment sites were included in the MD group,including 53 sites with PD≥6 mm and 23 sites with PD＜6 mm.At baseline,there was no statistically significant difference in PD,mSBI,and mPLI between the two groups.At 6 and 12 weeks after treatment,there were statistically significant differences in clinical indicators between the two groups compared to baseline(P＜0.05).Among them,the mSBI in the PDT group was significantly lower than that in the MD group at 6 weeks after treatment(P＜0.05).At sites with PD≥6 mm,the mSBI of the PDT group was significantly lower than that of the MD group at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment(P＜0.05).The number of implants in the PDT group and MD group that reached the treatment endpoint at 12 weeks follow-up was 70.00%and 55.56%,respectively,and there was no difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Photodynamic therapy assisted with mechanical debridement can effectively treat peri-implantitis and is a safe and ef-fective auxiliary method,and has significant therapeutic effects on in-flammation control and improvement of mSBI in those sites with PD≥6 mm.
