The value of apolipoprotein A-Ⅰ combined with serum amyloid A in judging the severity and prognosis of patients with sepsis and septic shock
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2024.05.009
- VernacularTitle:载脂蛋白A-I联合血清淀粉样蛋白A判断脓毒症及脓毒症休克患者的病情及预后价值
- Author:
Rui TAN
1
;
Penglei YANG
;
Jing WANG
;
Ruiqiang ZHENG
;
Hongjun MIAO
;
Jiangquan YU
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学附属儿童医院急诊重症医学科，南京 210008
- Keywords:
Sepsis;
Septic shock;
Apolipoprotein A-Ⅰ;
Serum amyloid A;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2024;33(5):643-650
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the levels of serum amyloid A protein (SAA) and apolipoprotein A-Ⅰ (ApoA-Ⅰ) with the severity and prognosis of septic patients, in order to find new clinical prognostic markers for sepsis patients.Methods:This study prospectively included patients admitted to the intensive care unit of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from September 2021 to February 2022. Patients were diagnosed with sepsis according to the Sepsis-3 criteria and aged between 18 and 80 years old. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected at 0 h, 24 h, and 72 h after inclusion in the study, measured the levels of ApoA-Ⅰ and SAA, and the 72 h ΔSAA and 72 h ΔApoA-Ⅰwere calculated.. Patient demographics, laboratory parameters, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) scores, sequential organ failure assessment scores, etc., were recorded. Patients were divided into survival and death groups based on outcomes, and were divided into shock and non-shock groups based on the presence of shock. Logistic regression was used to combine ApoA-I and SAA to establish a new combined index. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of SAA, ApoA-Ⅰ, 72 h ΔApoA-Ⅰ, 72 h ΔSAA and the combined SAA and ApoA-Ⅰ for the prognosis of sepsis patients.Results:A total of 108 patients were included in the analysis, with 48 cases in the non-septic shock group and 60 cases in the septic shock group; 77 cases in the survival group and 31 cases in the death group. There were statistically significant differences in SAA and ApoA-Ⅰ levels at each time point between the shock and non-shock groups (all P<0.05), as well as between the death and survival groups (all P<0.05). SAA levels at each time point were positively correlated with APACHEⅡ scores (all P<0.001), while ApoA-Ⅰ levels at each time point were negatively correlated with APACHEⅡ scores (all P<0.01). SAA levels could predict the risk of death in sepsis patients, with the highest area under curve (AUC) value at 24 h SAA (AUC=0.713, P=0.001), sensitivity was 65.3%, and specificity was 72.7% for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis. ApoA-Ⅰ levels at each time point could also predict the risk of death in sepsis patients, with the highest AUC value at 72 h ApoA-Ⅰ (AUC=0.743, P<0.001), sensitivity was 69.4%, and specificity was 77.1% for predicting 28-day survival in sepsis. The combined detection of 24 h SAA and 72 h ApoA-Ⅰ increased the AUC value (AUC=0.758, P<0.05), but the Z test showed that the prediction of death risk in patients with sepsis was not significantly higher than that of a single index ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Serum levels of SAA and ApoA-Ⅰ could reflect the severity of sepsis in patients and serve as independent indicators for predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients. The overall diagnostic efficacy of the combined SAA and ApoA-Ⅰ was not significantly different from that of a single index.
