Effect evaluation of three different cleaning methods on microsurgical instruments cleaning
10.3760/j.issn.1674-2907.2014.35.042
- VernacularTitle:三种显微手术器械清洗方法的效果比较
- Author:
Jianfang BAO
1
;
Dongping HE
;
Xiaoyun XU
Author Information
1. 226001 南通大学附属医院消毒供应中心
- Keywords:
Microsurgical instruments;
Cleaning;
Primary treatment;
Effect evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2014;20(35):4519-4521
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the best way of microsurgical instruments cleaning to improve the cleaning effect .Methods Based on random principle , the ophthalmic and hand surgery microsurgery instruments were divided into three groups ( control group ,soak group and oscillation of washing group ,each group 450 cases)after being used.The general group was cleaned directly without primary treatment ,soak group used multienzyme abluent and oscillation of washing group used ultrasonic cleaning respectively .Then all the three groups were cleaned by gentle cycle of automated Multi-chamber Washer .The cleaning effects were checked and compared by single eyeballing and magnification inspected .Results It was found that qualification numbers of the three groups by single eyeballing was 341,402 and 439, with qualification rates 75.78%,89.33% and 97.56%respectively .and qualification numbers by magnification inspected was 319, 381 and 428, and that qualification rates were 70.89%,84.67%and 95.11%, respectively.The qualified rates of oscillation of washing group were higher than that of other two groups , the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =99.894 6, 96.682 3, respectively;P<0.01).Conclusions The ideal method of microsurgical instruments cleaning is use the automated Multi-chamber Washer after soaking in multienzyme abluent and using Ultrasonic cleaning .
