Influence of limb-lead combination on the accuracy of the estimation of cardiac electrical axis
10.16289/j.cnki.1002-0837.2024.03001
- VernacularTitle:肢体导联组合对心电轴估计精度影响的研究
- Author:
Yanjun LI
1
;
Weibo LIU
;
Guoqiang GONG
;
Lin ZHANG
;
Jinzhong SONG
;
Yijing YANG
Author Information
1. 中国航天员科研训练中心,北京 100094
- Keywords:
ECG;
cardiac electrical axis;
QRS axis,axis deflection;
axis left shift;
axis right shift;
limb leads
- From:Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
2024;35(3):137-142
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective There are 6 leads of limb lead ECG,and the cardiac electrical axis can be estimated by any combination of two leads.In this paper,the estimation accuracy of all 15 pairs of limb-lead combinations was compared.Methods Using the open database of 12-lead electrocardiograms(at a sampling frequency of 500 Hz with duration of 10 seconds during resting state)from PhysioNet,totally 21 306 ECG records were extracted with age≥18 years which labeled as single sinus type(axis normal),including 6 153 records with Sinus Rhythm,10 916 records with Sinus Bradycardia,3 466 records with Sinus Tachycardia,and 771 records with Sinus Irregularity.Moreover,totally 2 323 axis deflection recordings with age≥18 years were extracted,including 1 526 records with Axis left shift,and 797 records with Axis right shift.Cardiac electrical axis was estimated with the net amplitude(or area)of QRS complex(algebraic sum of positive and negative amplitude or area)by any pair of leads from{Ⅰ,Ⅱ},{Ⅰ,Ⅲ},{Ⅰ,aVR},{Ⅰ,aVL},{Ⅰ,aVF},{Ⅱ,Ⅲ},{Ⅱ,aVR},{Ⅱ,aVL},{Ⅱ,aVF},{Ⅲ,aVR},{Ⅲ,aVL},{Ⅲ,aVF},{aVR,aVL},{aVR,aVF},{aVL,aVF},respectively.Results For the amplitude-based method,the recognition accuracy for the normal,left and right axes from{Ⅰ,Ⅱ}and{Ⅱ,aVL}is 93.56%and 93.50%,respectively,which is better than that of the traditional classical method{I,aVF}(92.93%).For the area-based method,the recognition accuracy from{Ⅲ,aVR},{Ⅰ,aVR},{Ⅰ,Ⅱ},{aVR,aVF},{Ⅱ,aVL}and{Ⅱ Ⅲ}is 92.66%,92.53%,92.29%,92.19%,92.10%and 91.91%,respectively,which is better than the traditional classical method{Ⅰ,aVF}(91.82%).Conclusion The accuracy of amplitude-based method is higher than that of area-based method.Lead pair{Ⅰ,Ⅱ}and{Ⅱ,aVL}have higher accuracy than traditional classical{Ⅰ,aVF}in automatic estimation of cardiac electrical axis for both amplitude and area method.
