Clinical efficacy of HI-NPPV in the treatment of AECOPD combined with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230329
- VernacularTitle:HI-NPPV治疗AECOPD合并严重Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床疗效
- Author:
Rui JIANG
1
;
Xuejiao LI
;
Yinhong HE
;
Yanlin LI
;
Xiaolong WANG
Author Information
1. 重庆医科大学附属第二医院急救部,重庆 400010
- Keywords:
acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure;
high intensity non-invasive positive pressure ventilation
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2024;49(2):266-272
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD)combined with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure have a high probability of ventilation failure using conventional non-invasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV).This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of high intensity NPPV(HI-NPPV)for the treatment of AECOPD combined with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure. Methods:The data of patients with AECOPD combined with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure(blood gas analysis pH≤7.25)treated with NPPV in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from July 2013 to July 2023 were collected to conduct a retrospective case-control study.The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the inspired positive airway pressure(IPAP)used during the NPPV treatment:a NPPV group(IPAP<20 cmH2O,1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)and a HI-NPPV group(20 cmH2O≤IPAP<30 cmH2O).Ninety-nine and 95 patients were included in the NPPV group and the HI-NPPV group,respectively.A total of 86 pairs of data were matched using propensity score matching(PSM)for data matching.The primary outcome indexes(mortality and tracheal intubation rate)and secondary outcome indexes[blood gas analysis pH,arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2),adverse reaction rate,and length of hospitalization]were compared between the 2 groups. Results:The tracheal intubation rates of the NPPV group and the HI-NPPV group were 6.98％and 1.16％,respectively,and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant(χ2=4.32,P<0.05);the mortality of the NPPV group and the HI-NPPV group was 23.26％and 9.30％,respectively,and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant(χ2=11.64,P<0.01).The PaO2 at 24 h and 48 h after treatment of the HI-NPPV group was higher than that of the NPPV group,and the PaCO2 of the HI-NPPV group was lower than that of the NPPV group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The differences of pH at 24 h and 48 h after treatment between the 2 groups were not statistically significant(both P>0.05).The differences between the 2 groups in adverse reaction rate and hospitalization length were not statistically significant(both P>0.05). Conclusion:HI-NPPV can reduce mortality and tracheal intubation rates by rapidly improving the ventilation of patients with AECOPD combined with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure.This study provides a new idea for the treatment of patients with AECOPD combined with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure.
