Clinical study of exploring the ED95 of Propofol mono-sedation for successfully inserting the gastroscope in healthy adults by biased coin design up-and-down sequential method
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20231205-00158
- VernacularTitle:偏币随机序贯法观察丙泊酚镇静抑制成人胃镜插入反应ED95的临床研究
- Author:
Lei WAN
1
;
Peipei HAO
;
Wenjing LI
;
Ye ZHANG
;
Ming JI
;
Fukun LIU
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院麻醉科，北京 100050
- Keywords:
Gastroscopy;
Validation studies;
Dose-response relationship, drug;
Response to gastroscope insertion;
Propofol;
Biased coin design up-and-down sequential m
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2024;51(6):408-413
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the 95% effective dose (ED95) of Propofol mono-sedation for successfully inserting the gastroscope in healthy adults by biased coin design up-and-down sequential method.Methods:Using prospective study method, a total of 40 patients proposed for painless gastroscopy in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from April to May 2021 were selected. There were 15 males and 25 females. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification: grade I 26 cases, grade Ⅱ 14 cases. The mean age was (50.80±9.14) years, and the mean body mass index was (24.08±2.65) kg/m 2. Propofol mono-sedation was used in all patients. The initial dose of Propofol was set as 1.6 mg/kg, adjusted with 0.1 mg/kg as a step size. The biased coin design up-and-down sequential method was used in this study. The Propofol dose of subsequent patients was determined by the response to gastroscope insertion of the previous patient. If the gastroscopy insertion reaction of the previous patient was positive, the Propofol dose of the next patient was increased by one level (0.1 mg/kg); if the gastroscopy insertion reaction of the previous patient was negative, the biased coin random was performed, and the Propofol dose used by the next patient was reduced by one level (0.1 mg/kg) with 5% probability and remained unchanged with 95% probability. Changes of mean arterial pressure, heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded at different time points, and adverse reactions such as perioperative hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia and hypoxemia were recorded. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and t-test was used for comparison between different time points. The ED95 and 95% CI of Propofol in inhibiting the response to gastroscope insertion was calculated by Probit regression analysis. Results:All 40 patients successfully completed the gastroscopy. The calculated ED95 of Propofol mono-sedation for successfully inserting the gastroscope was 2.58 mg/kg with 95% CI of 2.40-3.31 mg/kg. The mean arterial pressure before anesthesia, after propofol injection, at the time of gastroscopy going through throat and immediately after examination was (97.33±13.34) mmHg, (93.15±11.35) mmHg, (78.95±9.30) mmHg, (79.38±9.94) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), respectively. The mean arterial pressure at the time of gastroscopy going through throat and immediately after examination decreased significantly, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.01). There were no significant differences in heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation compared with those before anesthesia ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The ED95 of Propofol mono-sedation for successfully inserting the gastroscope is determined as 2.58 mg/kg (95% CI: 2.40-3.31 mg/kg) by biased coin design up-and-down sequential method.
