Second premolar agenesis is associated with mandibular form:a geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular cross-sections
- Author:
Bertl H MICHAEL
1
;
Bertl KRISTINA
;
Wagner MANUEL
;
Gahleitner ANDR
;
Stavropoulos ANDREAS
;
Ulm CHRISTIAN
;
Mitteroecker PHILIPP
Author Information
- Keywords: agenesis; cross-sections; geometric morphometrics; mandibular form
- From: International Journal of Oral Science 2016;8(4):254-260
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare mandibular form (i.e., size and shape) between patients with agenesis of the lower second premolar (P2) and a control group with no agenesis. Three hypotheses were tested: (H1) agenesis causes a change in mandibular morphology because of inadequate alveolar ridge development in the area of the missing tooth (mandibular plasticity); (H2) agenesis is caused by spatial limitations within the mandible (dental plasticity); and (H3) common genetic/epigenetic factors cause agenesis and affect mandibular form (pleiotropy). A geometric morphometric analysis was applied to cross-sectional images of computed tomography (CT) scans of three matched groups (n=50 each):(1) regularly erupted P2;(2) agenesis of P2 and the primary second molar in situ;and (3) agenesis of P2 and the primary second molar missing for 43 months. Cross-sections of the three areas of interest (first premolar, P2, first molar) were digitized with 23 landmarks and superimposed by a generalized Procrustes analysis. On average, the mandibular cross-sections were narrower and shorter in patients with P2 agenesis compared with that in the control group. Both agenesis groups featured a pronounced submandibular fossa. These differences extended at least one tooth beyond the agenesis-affected region. Taken together with the large interindividual variation that resulted in massively overlapping group distributions, these findings support genetic and/or epigenetic pleiotropy (H3) as the most likely origin of the observed covariation between mandibular form and odontogenesis. Clinically, reduced dimensions and greater variability of mandibular form, as well as a pronounced submandibular fossa, should be expected during the treatment planning of patients with P2 agenesis.
