Analysis on effects of EFTR-C and ESE for treating≤1.5 cm intraluminal growth type gastric stromal tumor
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2024.17.005
- VernacularTitle:EFTR-C与ESE治疗≤1.5 cm腔内生长型胃间质瘤的疗效分析
- Author:
Bin HUANG
1
;
Haixiao FU
;
Bin LI
;
Xuhua XIAO
Author Information
1. 桂林医学院附属医院消化内科,广西桂林 541001
- Keywords:
gastric stromal tumor;
cap-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection;
endoscopic submu-cosal excavation
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2024;53(17):2583-2587
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of transparency cap-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection(EFTR-C)and endoscopic submucosal excavation(ESE)in the treatment of ≤1.5 cm intracavity growth type gastric stromal tumor.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the medi-cal records of 63 patients with ≤1.5 cm intraluminal growth type gastric stromal tumor treated in this hospi-tal from June 2019 to September 2023.The patients were divided into the EFTR-C group(n=33)and ESE group(n=30)according to surgical methods.The general data,operation situation,postoperative situation and follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistically significant differ-ence in the intraoperative pneumoperitoneum rate,purse string suture rate,monoblock resection rate,complete resection rate and complication occurrence rate between the two groups(P＞0.05).The operative time,inci-dence rate of intraoperative bleeding,number of titanium clips,postoperative fasting time,postoperative hospi-talization duration and operation costs had statistical difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).Postoper-ative wound healing was good in both groups without recurrence,metastasis and death.Conclusion EFTR-C for the treatment of ≤1.5 cm intracavity growth type gastric stromal tumor has the advantages of simple op-eration,short operation time,low costs and rapid recovery compared with ESE.
