Study on safety vein lienable needle instead of seldinger vein needle when the failure of PICC by MST
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2011.09.043
- VernacularTitle:安全型留置针在改良塞丁格法穿刺失败后的替代应用研究
- Author:
Li-Juan YU
1
;
Su-Ping WEI
;
Guo-Rong WANG
;
YANG-Qing
;
SHI-Li
;
Li-Juan CHENG
Author Information
1. 四川省肿瘤医院
- Keywords:
Safety vein lienable needle;
Modified seldinger technique;
Instead ways
- From:
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2011;17(9):1099-1101
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the feasibility of safety vein lienable needle instead of seldinger vein needle when the failure of PICC by MST. Methods 35 patients failed PICC by MST were divided into two groups randomly, Traditional method group: MST; Alternative group: safety lienable needle inserting. 20 patients with puncture success were selected as control group, and the bleeding, puncture time, phlebitis and fees were compared in 3 groups. Results The bleeding in Traditional method group and Alternative group were much more than Control group, the difference was significant (P < 0. 01 ) , but the difference between Traditional method group and Alternative group was not significant (P > 0. 05 ). The time of inserting PICC in Traditional method group and Alternative group were much longer than Control group, the difference were significant (P < 0. 01 ), but the difference between Traditional method group and Alternative group was not significant ( P > 0. 05 ). The difference of phlebitis in each group were not significant (P > 0. 05). The fee in Traditional method group was higher than others (P<0. 01). Conclusions It could neither increasing the time of PICC, nor the bleeding and phlebitis by using safety lienable needle instead of seldinger needle when the failure PICC by MST.
