The significance of placental ratios in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus.
10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.358
- Author:
Hee Sun KIM
1
;
Soo Hyun CHO
;
Han Sung KWON
;
In Sook SOHN
;
Han Sung HWANG
Author Information
1. Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hwanghs@kuh.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Birth weight/placental weight ratio;
Complicated pregnancies;
Placental volume
- MeSH:
Birth Weight;
Diabetes, Gestational*;
Female;
Gestational Age*;
Humans;
Parturition;
Pre-Eclampsia*;
Pregnancy Complications;
Pregnancy*;
Pregnant Women
- From:Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2014;57(5):358-366
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the placental weight, volume, and density, and investigate the significance of placental ratios in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age (SGA), preeclampsia (PE), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four pregnant women were enrolled from August 2005 through July 2013. Participants were divided into four groups: control (n=82), SGA (n=37), PE (n=102), and GDM (n=33). The PE group was classified as PE without intrauterine growth restriction (n=65) and PE with intrauterine growth restriction (n=37). Birth weight, placental weight, placental volume, placental density, and placental ratios including birth weight/placental weight ratio (BPW) and birth weight/placental volume ratio (BPV) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Birth weight, placental weight, and placental volume were lower in the SGA group than in the control group. However, the BPW and BPV did not differ between the two groups. Birth weight, placental weight, placental volume, BPW, and BPV were all significantly lower in the PE group than in the control group. Compared with the control group, birth weight, BPW, and BPV were higher in the GDM group, whereas placental weight and volume did not differ in the two groups. Placental density was not significantly different among the four groups. CONCLUSION: Placental ratios based on placental weight, placental volume, placental density, and birth weight are helpful in understanding the pathophysiology of complicated pregnancies. Moreover, they can be used as predictors of pregnancy complications.
