Chinese version of evidence-based practice-knowledge, attitude, application, anticipated future use (EBP-KAPF) scale and its reliability and validity
10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230718-00012
- VernacularTitle:临床医生循证医学能力自我评估量表（EBP-KAPF）的汉化与信效度验证
- Author:
Wenxin YAN
1
;
Jiaojiao LIAO
;
Qirui SHAO
;
Lin ZENG
;
Yiming ZHAO
;
Jue LIU
;
Liyuan TAO
Author Information
1. 北京大学公共卫生学院 流行病与卫生统计学系，北京 100191
- Keywords:
Evidence-based medicine;
Physicians;
Evaluation studies;
Scale
- From:
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
2024;58(4):481-488
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate Evidence-based Practice-knowledge, attitude, application, anticipated future use (EBP-KAPF) scale into Chinese, and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods:The Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale was determined through translation, adaptation, recall, review and pre-investigation. From July to August 2022, 250 clinicians from 28 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) were selected by using the convenience sampling method. A self-made questionnaire was used to investigate the EBP-KAPF scale in Chinese to investigate the EBM ability of clinicians, including the basic information of the respondents, the learning and use of Evidence-based medicine courses and related software. The item analysis, validity and reliability evaluation of the Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale were performed.Results:The Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale included 26 items in four dimensions: knowledge mastery, attitude, personal application and future use. A total of 265 questionnaires were sent out (including self-made questionnaires and the Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale), and 250 effective questionnaires were obtained, with a total effective rate of 94.3%. The total score of the Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale was (102.85±17.48) points, and the scores of knowledge mastery, attitude, personal application and future use sub-scales were (27.22±4.47), (13.56±7.70), (20.07±6.78), and (42.00±9.00) points, respectively. Except for item 16, all items were correlated with the total score of the scale, and the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.456 to 0.828. After item 16 was deleted, the determination values of the remaining 25 items ranged from 4.287 to 18.262 ( P<0.001). After item was removed one by one, the Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale ranged from 0.870 to 0.888. After item 16 was removed, the Chinese version of the 25-item EBP-KAPF scale had good content validity, structural validity and discriminant validity. The content validity index (I-CVI) at the item level ranged from 0.875 to 1.000, and the content validity index at the overall agreement scale level was 0.615. The average S-CVI values were 0.952, and the probability of correction ( K*) values were 0.87 to 1.00. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the structure fit was good [comparative fit index (CFI)=0.962, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.957, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.060, χ2/ df=1.889]. Discriminant validity analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in the EBP-KAPF scores among clinicians of different ages, evidence-based medicine course learning and related software use ( P<0.05). After item 16 was removed, the Cronbach′s α coefficient of the Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale was 0.893, and the Guttman half coefficients of each dimension were 0.915, 0.901, 0.812 and 0.906, respectively. The correlation coefficients were 0.902-0.982, 0.507-0.953, 0.517-0.744 and 0.632-0.986, respectively. Conclusion:The Chinese version of the EBP-KAPF scale is simple, easy to understand, unambiguous, and has good validity and reliability.
