Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail
10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200413-00301
- VernacularTitle:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术和传统胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾导管腺癌的临床效果分析
- Author:
Jie YIN
1
;
Xumin HUANG
;
Zipeng LU
;
Kai ZHANG
;
Pengfei WU
;
Dong XU
;
Cuncai DAI
;
Junli WU
;
Wentao GAO
;
Jishu WEI
;
Feng GUO
;
Jianmin CHEN
;
Kuirong JIANG
;
Yi MIAO
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院胰腺中心 210029
- Keywords:
Pancreatic neoplasms;
Pancreatectomy;
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy;
Distal pancreatectomy;
Adenocarcinoma of pancreas;
Complication;
Survi
- From:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
2020;58(7):505-511
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the short-term outcomes and long-term survivals of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy(RAMPS) and conventional distal pancreatectomy(CDP).Methods:A total of consecutive 304 patients including 176 male patients and 128 female patients who underwent RAMPS or CDP at Pancreas Center, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from May 2013 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The median age was 64.1 years old (range:39 to 85 years old). There were 101 patients underwent RAMPS and 203 patients underwent CDP. Measurement data with skewed distribution were presented as ( M( Q R)) and comparison between groups was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Count data were analyzed using the χ 2 test or Fisher exact probability. Survival analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method after a one to one propensity score matching(PSM) conducted to balance several variables. Results:An eighty-one to eighty-one patients were enrolled after PSM. The overall morbidity was 32.1%(26/81)and there were no in-hospital mortalities in RAMPS. The median operative time was 225(95)minutes in RAMPS, not significantly longer as compared with CDP(210(130)minutes, P=0.916). The median greatest tumor diameter in RAMPS was 4.0(2.3)cm, not significantly larger as compared with CDP(4.5(2.2)cm, P=0.520).There were 34.6%(28/81)patients who presented with T4 tumors by 8 th AJCC TNM staging system in RAMPS, which was not significantly different as compared with CDP(39.5%, χ 2=0.574, P=0.902). The median number of examined lymph nodes was 9(9), not significantly greater in RAMPS as compared with CDP(10(11), P=0.992). The rate of negative posterior margins using 1 mm rule in RAMPS was 70.3%(52/74), significantly higher as compared with CDP(53.6%(30/56), χ 2=3.817, P=0.044). The overall R0 resection rate was 44.6% (33/74) in RAMPS and 37.5% (21/56) in CDP, which was not significantly different(χ 2=0.663, P=0.474). The median overall survival was 16.5 months for RAMPS, 25.2 months for CDP, and there was no statistical difference between two groups( P=0.981). The median overall survival was 16.0 months for patients with preoperative CA19-9≥300 U/ml who underwent RAMPS, 10.1 months for patients who underwent CDP, without significant difference( P=0.082). Conclusions:RAMPS can improve the rate of negative posterior margins by 1 mm rule and probably increase R0 resection rate and the harvest of lymph nodes. RAMPS may be beneficial to some patients with preoperative CA19-9≥300 U/ml.
