Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Retrospective Review of a 4-Year Experience.
- Author:
Jun Kyeung KO
1
;
Chang Hwa CHOI
;
Tae Hong LEE
;
Seung Kug BAIK
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Busan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. chwachoi@pusan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cerebral aneurysm;
Endovascular treatment;
Detachable coil;
Complication;
Rebleeding
- MeSH:
Aneurysm;
Angiography;
Arteries;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Intracranial Aneurysm*;
Mortality;
Neck;
Parents;
Retrospective Studies*;
Rupture;
Thromboembolism
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2003;34(5):419-427
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluate the usefulness, results, and technical problem of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coil(GDC). METHODS: Forty patients with 31 ruptured and 11 unruptured aneurysms were treated with GDC embolization. Twenty-four aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation and 18 in the posterior circulation. Aneurysms size was categorized small(n=31) or large(n=11) and neck size was categorized narrow(n=30) or wide(n=12). We statistically analyzed occlusion rate according to the location, rupture, size, and neck size of aneurysms, and investigated the procedure-related complications and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: GDC treatment of aneursyms was successful in 40 aneurysms of 39 patients(95.2%). Total occlusion was achieved in 24(60.0%) cases, subtotal occlusion in 12(30%), and incomplete occlusion in 4(10.0%). Each total occlusion rate was 69.0% in small-sized, 36.4% in large-sized, 69.0% in narrow-necked, and 36.4% in wide-necked aneurysms. Location and rupture of aneurysms did not influence occlusion rate. The technical complications included 4 thromboembolisms, 3 parent artery occlusions, and 1 perforation of aneurysm. Procedure-related morbidity and mortality were 10.3% and 2.6%. 3 subtotally or incompletely embolized aneurysms in posterior circulation rebled during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that endovascular GDC treatment is an appropriate therapeutic alternative in cerebral aneurysms. However, the rebleeding by aneurysmal recanalization or regrowth is a major limitation of GDC treatment. Follow-up angiography and further technical improvement are mandatory to overcome rebleeding.
