Therapeutic efficiency of multiple forms of microdissected perforator flaps in the reconstruction of limb defect
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20230217-00035
- VernacularTitle:多种形式显微修薄穿支皮瓣在四肢创面修复中的应用
- Author:
Jie FANG
1
;
Ziqiang DONG
;
Weiya QI
;
Song ZHANG
;
Xu ZHANG
;
Hui ZHU
;
Dawei ZHENG
Author Information
1. 徐州仁慈医院手外科，徐州 221004
- Keywords:
Surgical flaps;
Perforator flap;
Microsurgery;
Microdissected flap
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2023;39(9):947-952
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the therapeutic efficiency of multiple forms of microdissected perforator flaps in the reconstruction of limb defect.Methods:The data of patients treated in the Department of Hand Surgery of Xuzhou Renci Hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 for repairing wound of hands, feet, limbs and popliteal fosses with microdissected perforator flap were retrospectively analyzed. CT angiography and color Doppler ultrasound were performed in all patients before surgery to locate perforator vessels, design the donor flap, and cut the flap retrograde according to the design line. After confirming good blood supple, the flap was harvested under the microscope, and fat particles were cut around the vascular pedicle by "insect eating" technique. After that, the flap was transferred to the recipient area, completed the vascular anastomosis, and placed the drainage tube. The donor site was closed directly. The blood circulation of the flap was observed closely after operation. Regular follow-up visits were conducted in outpatient clinics, door-to-door visits and WeChat to record sensory recovery and complications. Postoperative wound healing, flap shape, flap sensation, flap temperature and scar in donor area were evaluated using the efficacy satisfaction scale, which was divided into four grades: excellent (2 points), good (1 point), fair (0 point) and poor (-1 point). The total score of 5-10 was satisfactory, 0-4 was average, and -1--5 was unsatisfactory.Results:A total of 16 patients were included, including 8 males and 8 females. The age ranged from 26 to 65 years, with an average age of 45.9 years. There were 2 cases of upper limb soft tissue defect, 2 cases of hand degloving injury, 11 cases of hand skin soft tissue defect, and 1 case of popliteal soft tissue defect. The wound size ranged from 3.0 cm×4.5 cm to 13.0 cm×30.0 cm. Free medial sural artery perforator flap was used in 4 cases, interosseous dorsal artery perforator flap in 1 case, anterolateral femoral perforator flap in 6 cases, thoracic umbilical flap in 1 case, anterolateral femoral perforator flap combined with superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap in 1 case, and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap in 3 cases. The size of the skin flap was 3.5 cm×5.0 cm - 9.5 cm×30.0 cm. After operation, 15 cases of flaps successfully survived, 1 case of venous crisis occurred 1 day after operation, and successfully survived after exploration and re-anastomosis of blood vessels. The wounds in the donor area healed in one stage without wound infection, delayed healing and other complications. All patients were follow-up for 7 to 18 months (mean 12.1 months), the skin flap survived well, no pigmentation, bloated appearance, and no patients requested secondary thinning treatment. The skin flap sensation recovered light touch in 1 case, protective sense in 9 cases and deep touch only in 6 cases. No significant thickening of skin flap was observed in the later period of follow-up, and skin flap wear was observed in 1 patient. There were only linear scars left in the donor area, and there were no obvious abnormalities in appearance and function. Efficacy satisfaction evaluation showed that all patients were satisfied with the therapeutic effect, scoring 6-9 points, with an average of 7.8 points.Conclusion:Microdissected perforator flap technique provides a one-stage surgical solution for aesthetic and functional areas with high requirements, and satisfactory clinical efficiencies can be obtained.
