Surgical Usage of a Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screw to Treat Lumbar Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Preliminary Report.
10.4184/jkss.2016.23.4.216
- Author:
Young Yul KIM
1
;
Chanjoo PARK
;
Kee Won RHYU
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lumbar;
Pyogenic spondylodiscitis;
Cortical bone trajectory pedicle screw;
Posterior instrumentation
- MeSH:
Clinical Study;
Congenital Abnormalities;
Debridement;
Discitis*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Pedicle Screws*;
Retrospective Studies;
Transplants;
Weights and Measures
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2016;23(4):216-222
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a cortical bone trajectory pedicle screw (CBT-PS) for the treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Pedicle screws were used for surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis to prevent instability and deformity. CTB-PS are typically inserted from the inferomedial to superolateral direction of the pedicle and have yielded satisfactory results in degenerative or osteoporotic spinal disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with single segment lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis were analyzed. At first, anterior debridements and interbody fusions were perfomed with autogenous strut bone grafts, followed by posterior fixations and fusions with CBT-PS. The lordotic angles of operated levels were checked at the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-ups. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were checked at the preoperative and final follow-ups. RESULTS: Lesion sites were found at four L3-4, three L4-5, and one L2-3. Follow-ups were held at 26.13±8.23 months. The lordotic angles at preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-ups were 12.13±3.09°, 14.63±3.16°, and 12.75±3.99°, retrospectively. There were significant differences between results from the preoperative-postoperative and postoperative-final follow ups. There was no difference in the preoperative-final follow up. There was a significant difference between the VAS at the preoperative and final follow-ups (8.13±0.83 and 2.38±0.92, retrospectively). Complete bony unions of were observed at the final follow-up in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of using a CBT-PS for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis included the ability to minimize damage from the screw for both the posterior structure damage and the operated anterior area to prevent instability and deformity, and to achieve rigid bone union. CBT-PS is a potential surgical option for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
