Effectiveness and safety of nonablative fractional laser and infrared bipolar radiofrequency on periorbital wrinkles: a randomized self-controlled trial
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20210412-00163
- VernacularTitle:非剥脱点阵激光和红外双极射频治疗眼周静态皱纹效果和安全性的随机自身对照研究
- Author:
Xianglei WU
1
;
Qingqing CEN
;
Ying LIU
;
Wenxin YU
;
Jiafang ZHU
;
Ying SHANG
;
Xiaoxi LIN
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院激光美容科 200011
- Keywords:
Laser therapy;
Nonablative fractional laser;
Radiofrequency;
Periorbital wrinkles
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2021;37(6):592-598
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate and compare the effectiveness and safety of infrared bipolar radiofrequency (IR-RF) and nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) including 1 540 nm Er: glass and 1 927 nm thulium-doped laser, so as to choose a better pathway for clinical treatments on periorbital wrinkles.Methods:A prospective randomized self-controlled study was conducted in the Department of Laser and Aesthetic Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital. A total of 27 patients divided into 3 groups by random number table underwent split-face treatments between December 2019 and January 2021. Two of the three treatments were selected randomly for patients in each group: Group A, left side IR-RF vs. right side 1 540 nm NAFL; Group B, left side IR-RF vs. right side 1 927 nm NAFL; Group C, left side 1 540 nm NAFL vs. right side 1 927 nm NAFL. In total 3 sessions were given at 2 months interval. Therapeutic outcomes were evaluated by subjective (GAIS and Fitzpatrick wrinkle score) and objective (VISIA-CR) assessments. Side effects and pain visual evaluation (VAS) were also recorded. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the differences among the three therapeutic method , and relationships with VAS and patients’ age.Results:In total 30 patients (10 in each group) were recruited and finally 27 cases completed all treatments and follow-ups: Group A, 9 patients (male 3, female 6); Group B, 8 patients (male 3, female 5); Group C, 10 patients (male 4, female 6). The age distributions: Group A, 33-65 years, mean 36.9 years; Group B, 28-67 years, mean 38.6 years; Group C, 25-58 years, mean 37.8 years. GAIS comparisons: no statistical differences were found in each group between baseline and post-treatment ( P>0.05). Fitzpatrick wrinkle score: the overall analysis showed significant improvements were not found in IR-RF treated-side but were observed in 1 540 nm and 1 927 nm NAFL treated sides ( P<0.05). Furthermore, the 1 927 nm NAFL treated side showed more decreased scores than 1 540 nm NAFL treated side ( P<0.05). The VISIA analysis of feature counts of skin texture showed similar result. Besides, the patients over 50 years old showed significantly improvements compared with the ones under this age threshold in IR-RF treated sides ( P<0.05). The pain VAS in IR-RF treated side was significant lower than NAFL-treated side (2.2 vs. 5.8, P<0.05). Only one patient reported post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) in 1540 nm NAFL treated side, which disappeared progressively in 4 months after last treatment. Conclusion:Nonablative fractional laser is effective and safe in improving periorbital wrinkles. Infrared bipolar radiofrequency might be more suitable for elderly patients especially with low pain level.
