The application of magnetic resonance imaging-based mammary gland volumetry for breast reconstruction with silicone gel prothesis following nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20191026-00318
- VernacularTitle:磁共振成像乳腺体积测量在乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术后假体乳房重建手术中的应用
- Author:
Dawei WANG
1
;
Shixuan XIONG
;
Yuping REN
;
Min WU
;
Tao AI
;
Yiping WU
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院整形外科，武汉 430030
- Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Breast neoplasms;
Mastectomy;
Breast reconstruction;
Volumetry;
Silicone gel prothesis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2020;36(11):1203-1209
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:This study aimed to explore the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure breast volume and gland volume to guide reconstruction of breast reconstruction with silicone gel prothesis following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).Methods:According to the inclusion criteria, the breast cancer patients admitted to Wuhan Tongji Hospital from September 2018 to June 2019 were selected to undergo breast reconstruction with prosthesis after NSM. Preoperative MRI were used to measure distance from the tumor to the nipple-areola complex and the skin, and estimate the volume of breast and mammary gland. The data of breast volume measured by MRI, gland volume measured by MRI, volume of prosthesis and specimen weight were compared. The data were analyzed using Prism 8.0 software. The paired student t-test was used to compare the difference of two groups. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Linear regression models were used to obtain coefficient of determination ( R2), and R2>0.8 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 15 breast cancer patients, aged 28-45 years, with a mean of 35.5 years, were included. There were 13 cases unilateral and 2 cases bilateral. The clinical stages of stage 0, Ⅰ and Ⅱ were 8, 5 and 2 patients, respectively. The average distance o from tumor to nipple-areola complex was (3.1±0.8) cm. One patient suffered postoperative bleeding and was promptly reoperated through the original incision, and the patient recovered well after surgery. All patients felt sensory disturbance of the nipple and areola. There was no complication such as infection, seroma, capsular contracture, prosthesis rupture, and prosthesis shift. At 4-12 months postoperative follow-up, all breasts were basically symmetrical and no tumor recurrence or metastasis occurred, which satisfied the patients. The mean values of the volume of prosthesis, specimen weight, breast volume measured by MRI and gland volume measured by MRI were (471.10±45.60) ml, (244.60±29.14) ml, (243.60±31.16) g, (244.30±16.63) ml. There was significant difference between the breast volume measured by MRI and the specimen weight ( t=10.37, P<0.001), while no statistical difference was found between gland volume measured by MRI and specimen weight ( t=0.20, P=0.847). Similarly, there was significant difference between the breast volume measured by MRI and the volume of prosthesis ( t=5.19, P<0.001), while no statistical difference was found between gland volume measured by MRI and the volume of prosthesis ( t=1.74, P=0.104). The coefficient of determination between gland volume measured by MRI and specimen weight ( R2=0.98) was higher than that of breast volume measured by MRI ( R2=0.82). Similarly, the coefficient of determination between gland volume measured by MRI and the volume of prosthesis ( R2=0.71) was higher than that of breast volume measured by MRI ( R2=0.54). Conclusions:Preoperative MRI can provide guidance to breast reconstruction with silicone gel prothesis following nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer. The gland volume measured by MRI is closer to the specimen weight and the volume of prosthesis than the breast volume measured by MRI.
