The effect of different diagnostic standards on the diagnosis of suspected occupational noise-induced deafness
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20190929-00447
- VernacularTitle:不同版本诊断标准对疑似职业性噪声聋诊断结果影响的研究
- Author:
Laijun XUE
1
;
Jiebin TANG
;
Jianxin WANG
;
Aichu YANG
;
Zhiyi LI
Author Information
1. 511500 清远市职业病防治院
- Keywords:
Noise Occupational;
Suspected occupational noise-induced deafness;
Occupational health examination;
Language frequency mean;
Weighted high frequency
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2021;39(3):207-210
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of different diagnostic criteria on occupational noise-induced deafness (Onid) , and to provide theoretical basis for the revision of ONID diagnostic criteria.Methods:From January 2016 to January 2018, the physical examination results of noise-exposed workers during occupational health examination in Qingyuan Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment Hospital were retrospectively investigated in September 2019, with Gbz 49-2014《diagnosis of occupational noise deafness》as the study object, 471 workers suspected of Onid were weighted with different combinations of high frequency hearing threshold, and the better ear weight was calculated, compared with the diagnostic criteria of 2007 and 2014, the degree of hearing loss was evaluated. SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis, χ 2 test was used for counting data, and non-parametric test was used for measuring bias data. Results:The average age of 471 subjects was (40.32±7.01) years, and the average age of exposure to noise was (7.11±3.44) years. On the basis of the 2007 edition diagnostic standard, the suspected ONID diagnostic rate of different high frequency auditory threshold was increased by 16.35% and 30.15% at 3.0 kHz, 6.0 kHz increased by 20.17%, 3.0 kHz+4.0 kHz increased by 22.29%, 3.0 kHz+6.0 kHz increased by 17.20%, 4.0 kHz+6.0 kHz increased by 25.27%, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) , the frequency of 3.0 kHz+4.0 kHz+6.0 kHz increased by 22.29%. Using the 2014 edition diagnostic standard, the diagnostic rate of Onid was reduced by 30.15% and 13.80%, 6 kHz is 9.98% lower, 3.0 kHz+4.0 kHz is 7.86% lower, 3.0 kHz+6.0 kHz is 12.95% lower, 4.0 kHz+6.0 is 4.88% lower, the high frequency of 3.0 kHz+4.0 kHz+6.0 kHz decreased by 7.86%, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05) . Conclusion:The diagnosis rate of suspected Onid is increased by weighting different high frequency hearing threshold, in which the weighted 4kHz high frequency has the greatest influence on the result, and the weighted 3 kHz high frequency has the least.
