Clinical evaluation of root-resected teeth clinical outcome over 2 years.
10.5051/jkape.2006.36.4.809
- Author:
Chung Ho LEE
1
;
Jin Woo PARK
;
Jo Young SUH
;
Jae Mok LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Korea. leejm@knu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
tooth resection;
root amputation;
furcation treatment
- MeSH:
Furcation Defects;
Guided Tissue Regeneration;
Gyeongsangbuk-do;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Inflammation;
Mastication;
Molar;
Oral Hygiene;
Periodontal Diseases;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Tooth Extraction;
Tooth*
- From:The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology
2006;36(4):809-816
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Periodontal disease accompany the inflammation around periodontal tissue and generally periodontal destruction is followed. This destruction often makes the molar teeth have furcation defect. And to treat molar furcation involvement, resective surgery such as root resection and ostectomy and regenerative procedure such as guided tissue regeneration were introduced. Also implant can be considered as one of the good treatment methods. Among these treatment alternatives, root resection can be considered as a good procedure in the point of saving one's natural teeth or amount of cost. Therefore the purpose of this article is to evaluate root-resected teeth which were done at least 2 years ago. 70 root-resected teeth in 58 patient who visited Kyungpook National University Hospital were included in this study. They were evaluated by two clinical method. One is subjective evaluation and another is objective evaluation. To evaluate subjective outcome, 58 patients answered to the questionnaire if they experienced tooth extraction, bleeding, swelling, pain, mobility and chewing problem. To evaluate objective outcome, 28 teeth was evaluated according to Langer's criteria. The subjective result showed 82% of success rate and 18% of failure rate. 13 of 70 teeth showed discomfort and were considered as failure, which include chewing problem (39%) and pain (23%). The objective outcome showed that 4 failure (14% failure rate) which were 2 cases of bone loss by periodontal problem, one endodontic problem and one untreatable caries. By these limited results, some of clinical consideration in root resective procedure can be suggested. Periodontal support and less occlusal loading on resected tooth should be evaluated before the procedure, moreover, good oral hygiene is essential. When these factors are considered carefully, the root resection may produce predictive outcomes in the treatment of furcational involvement.
