Evaluation of Posterolateral Fusion Mass at Lumbosacral Junction Using Standard AP and Ferguson Radiographs.
10.4184/jkss.2001.8.3.235
- Author:
Hwan Mo LEE
1
;
Moon Soo PARK
;
Sang Hoon LEE
;
Kee Hak KIM
;
Jun Seop JAHNG
;
Seong Hwan MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shmoon@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lumbosacral region;
Posterolateral fusion;
Radiologic evaluation;
Ferguson radiograph
- MeSH:
Diagnosis;
Humans;
Lumbosacral Region;
Pseudarthrosis;
Transplants
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2001;8(3):235-241
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliance of standard AP radiograph and Ferguson radiograph in assessment of instrumented lumbosacral fusion mass with interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postoperative standard AP radiograph and Ferguson radiograph were used to evaluate the fusion mass at the lumbosacral region of 44 consecutive patients who underwent posterolateral L4-S1 or L5-S1 instrumented fusion with pedicle screws & autogenous iliac bone graft. Ferguson radiograph was performed with the x-ray beam oriented toward the cranial portion at 40degree relative to the x-ray table. All observations were performed independently by three observers, blinded to the history, diagnosis, and patient identity. The fusion mass was graded as solid, pseudarthrosis or questionable. A second review was repeated at 2 weeks after index review. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities were analyzed with Fleiss'method. RESULTS: Ferguson radiographs were more reliable than standard AP radiographs in detecting the fusion mass. Kappa values with the interobserver reproducibility were higher in Ferguson radiographs than in the standard AP radiographs. Kappa values with the intraobserver reproducibility of all three observers were higher in Ferguson radiographs than in the standard AP radiographs. The questionable fusion masses in the standard AP radiographs were revealed solid or pseudarthrosis in Ferguson radiographs in 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Ferguson radiograph is a more reliable method than standard AP radiograph in evaluating instrumented posterolateral fusion mass in lumbosacral region.
