Multi-index quantitative detection and quality difference evaluation of Gleditsia sinensis from different producing areas
- VernacularTitle:不同产地皂角刺多指标定量检测及质量差异评价
- Author:
Meifeng LIANG
1
;
Xiongfei WAN
1
;
Nian LIAO
1
;
Shanshan ZHU
1
;
Zhijian WANG
2
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，CR & WISCO General Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology，Wuhan 430080，China
2. School of Pharmacy，Hubei University of Chinese Medicine，Wuhan 430070，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gleditsia sinensis;
HPLC;
QAMS;
chemometrics;
weighted TOPSIS;
Logistic regression model;
quality difference
- From:
China Pharmacy
2025;36(5):568-573
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To establish a multi-index quantitative detection method， and to evaluate the quality difference of Gleditsia sinensis from different producing areas. METHODS The contents of protocatechuic acid， vanillic acid， isoscopoletin， scoparone， isovitexin， fustin， taxifolin， fisetin， quercetin， kaempferol， echinocystic acid， betulinic acid， β -sitosterol and stigmasterol were detected by high performance liquid chromatography-quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker （HPLC-QAMS）. The chromatographic column was Kromasil C18， the mobile phase was 0.2% phosphoric acid-acetonitrile solution （gradient elution）， the detection wavelengths were 254， 360， 210 nm for different index components， the column temperature was 30 ℃ ， the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min， and the sample injection volume was 10 μL. The contents of extract and total ash were detected according to the method of Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The quality differences of 30 batches of G. sinensis （No. S1-S30） from different producing areas were evaluated by chemometrics， weighted technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution （TOPSIS） analysis and Logistic regression model. RESULTS The linear ranges of 14 components were 1.55-77.50， 0.71- 35.50， 0.28-14.00， 0.96-48.00， 1.77-88.50， 0.09-4.50， 4.65-232.50， 1.49-74.50， 0.37-18.50， 1.18-59.00， 7.35-367.50， 3.58- 179.00， 0.49-24.50 and 0.21-10.50 μg/mL， respectively （all r＞0.999）. The RSDs of precision， stability （24 h） and repeatability were less than 2.00%； the average recoveries were 96.99%-100.13% （all RSDs＜2.00%）， and the relative correction factor had good repeatability. The contents of extract and total ash were Δ 基金项目 湖北省中医药科研立项青年人才项目 （No. 4.2%-12.5% and 0.5%-2.3%， respectively. There was no ZY2019Q014） significant difference in the content of 14 components measured by QAMS method and external standard method （P＞0.05）. The results of chemometrics showed that 30 batches of samples were clustered into 3 categories： S1 to S11 form one category， S12 to S20 form another category， and S21 to S30 constitute the third category. Echinocystic acid， betulinic acid， taxifolin， kaempferol， isovitexin， scoparone and protocatechuic acid may be the differential components affecting the quality of G. sinensis from different producing areas. The analysis results of the weighted TOPSIS method revealed that relative closeness （Jb） for 30 batches of G. sinensis ranged from 0.144 5 to 0.721 8， with S27 achieving the highest value （Jb） of 0.721 8. The analysis results of the Logistic regression model showed that S21-S30 batches of samples were of superior grade， S1-S11 were of intermediate grade， and S12-S20 were of inferior grade. CONCLUSIONS The established HPLC-QAMS method is simple and accurate. The comprehensive evaluation method is objective and comprehensive， and can be used to evaluate the quality difference of G. sinensis from different producing areas.
