One-stage revision for reconstructing acetabular defects by trabecular metal acetabular revision system in periprosthetic joint infection
10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240605-00278
- VernacularTitle:钽金属骨小梁髋臼系统重建假体周围感染髋臼缺损的临床效果
- Author:
Zhaoxi XUE
1
;
Yilixiati MAIMAITIAIMAITI
;
Wentao GUO
;
Boyong XU
;
Li CAO
Author Information
1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院关节外科，乌鲁木齐 830054
- Keywords:
Prosthesis-related infections;
Arthroplasty, replacement, hip;
Periprosthetic joint infection;
One-stage revision;
Tantalum trabecular metal acetabular re
- From:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
2024;62(9):847-855
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigates the clinical efficacy of the trabecular metal acetabular revision system (TMARS) in one-stage reconstruction of acetabular deficiencies associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).Methods:This is a retrospective case series study,including the data of 59 patients with PJI underwent acetabular defect reconstruction by TMARS during one-stage revisions in the Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2013 to December 2021. There were 32 males and 27 females, aged (59.5±14.6) years (range: 26 to 84 years). Among them, 29 cases used tantalum cups, 13 cases used tantalum cups and tantalum reinforcing blocks, 9 cases used cup-cage, and 8 cases used multi-cup reconstruction techniques. The surgery procedure, Harris Hip score (HHS), recovery of the hip rotation center, implant survival rate, postoperative reinfection rate, and complications were recorded. Data were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.Results:All of the 59 patients underwent the operations successfully. Operation time was (188.9±48.4) minutes (range: 110 to 340 minutes), and intraoperative bleeding volume was ( M(IQR)) 1 000(400)ml (range: 600 to 1 800 ml). After a postoperative follow-up of 5.1 (2.6) years (range: 2.0 to 10.5 years), the prosthesis survival rate was 94.9% (56/59). Recurrence of infection occurred in 3 cases (5.1%), aseptic loosening in 1case(1.7%), and hip dislocation in 4 cases (6.8%). At the last follow-up, HHS improved significantly(84 (12) vs. 44 (9), Z=-6.671, P<0.01), and the center of rotation of the hips were recovered in all cases. Conclusions:In one-stage revision surgeries aimed at reconstructing acetabular defects, utilizing the TMARS can provide stable initial fixation, restore a more natural center of rotation, significantly enhance early postoperative hip joint function, and reduce the likelihood of infection recurrence. This approach stands as a reliable choice for addressing acetabular defects during revision surgeries for infected hip joints.
