- Author:
Ye Jin PARK
1
;
Dae Hwan KANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma; Inoperable; Endoscopic; Drainage
- MeSH: Bile Duct Neoplasms/*surgery; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/*surgery; Cholangiocarcinoma/*surgery; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Drainage/adverse effects/instrumentation/*methods; *Endoscopy/adverse effects/instrumentation; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Stents; Treatment Outcome
- From:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2013;28(1):8-18
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma has an extremely poor prognosis and is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative management plays an important role in the treatment of patients with inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical, percutaneous, and endoscopic biliary drainage are three modalities available to resolve obstructive jaundice. Plastic stents were widely used in the past; however, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have become popular recently due to their long patency and reduced risk of side branch obstruction, and SEMS are now the accepted treatment of choice for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Bilateral drainage provides more normal and physiological biliary flow through the biliary ductal system than that of unilateral drainage. Unilateral drainage was preferred until recently because of its technical simplicity. But, with advancements in technology, bilateral drainage now achieves a high success rate and is the preferred treatment modality in many centers. However, the choice of unilateral or bilateral drainage is still controversial, and more studies are needed. This review focuses on the endoscopic method and discusses stent materials and types of procedures for patients with a hilar cholangiocarcinoma.