The recovery of abdominal function and patients’ satisfaction rate after the reconstruction of extensive soft tissue defects in limbs using lower abdominal flap based on three-dimensional computed tomography angiography
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20231210-00261
- VernacularTitle:三维CT血管成像辅助设计下腹部皮瓣修复四肢大范围软组织缺损术后患者腹部功能恢复及满意度研究
- Author:
Lining ZHAO
1
;
Jianwei WANG
;
Yong XIAO
;
Zhengyu WANG
Author Information
1. 山东省立第三医院创伤与手足外科，济南 250031
- Keywords:
Reconstructive surgical procedures;
Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography;
Abdominal flap;
Limbs;
Abdominal function
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2024;40(6):612-620
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the recovery of abdominal function and and satisfaction rate in patients who received lower abdominal skin flap repair of extensive soft tissue defects in the limbs based on three-dimensional computed tomography angiography(3D-CTA) technology.Methods:A retrospective study was performed to analyze clinical data from patients with extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs, who were admitted to Shandong Provincial Third Hospital between March 2017 and February 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) group and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) group, with SIEA flaps and DIEP flaps utilized respectively for tissue defect repair. Based on 3D-CTA imaging, the distribution range and vessel diameters of bilateral SIEA, superficial inferior epigastric veins (SIEV), and DIEP were delineated, facilitating the design and harvest of SIEA and DIEP flaps. Comparisons were drawn between preoperative 3D-CTA findings on the course and distribution of SIEA and SIEV, and intraoperative anatomical observations. In addition, the concordance between vessel diameters and pedicle lengths determined via preoperative 3D-CTA and intraoperative measurements was assessed. The flap survival, wound healing and surveyed patients’ satisfaction with wound repair were analyzed. A customized evaluation scale was utilized to assess abdominal contour one year post-surgery, scoring from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The abdominal health module of the BREAST-Q scale evaluated patients’ satisfaction with abdominal function preoperatively, three months postoperatively, and one year postoperatively, scoring from 20 to 100, with increasing scores indicating greater satisfaction. The measurement data that conform to the normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and the comparison between the two groups was performed using independent samples t-test. The comparison were conducted at multiple time points, repeated measures analysis of variance was performed, and for the comparison of scores within the group, paired t-test was applied. Results:A total of 21 patients were included, 3 males and 18 females, with an age range of 21 to 60 years and a mean age of 41 years. The range of skin and soft tissue defects was from 10.0 cm × 5.0 cm to 22.0 cm × 14.0 cm, and the range of skin flap harvesting was from 11.0 cm × 6.0 cm to 23.0 cm × 15.0 cm. There were 11 cases in the SIEA group and 10 cases in the DIEP group. Preoperative 3D-CTA examination showed that the course and distribution of SIEA and SIEV were consistent with intraoperative anatomical observations. There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of vessel diameters, pedicle lengths, and actual measurements between preoperative 3D-CTA examination and intraoperative measurements (all P > 0.05). No flap necrosis occurred postoperatively, wound healing was uneventful in all cases. At 1 year postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference in abdominal contour scores between the SIEA and DIEP groups [(21.96±3.51) points vs. (21.62±3.17) points, P > 0.05]. Comparison of preoperative abdominal function satisfaction scores between the SIEA and DIEP groups showed no statistically significant difference [(87.56 ± 5.70) points vs. (85.79 ± 6.33) points, P > 0.05]. However, at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, the SIEA group had higher scores than the DIEP group [at 3 months postoperatively, (77.62 ± 7.68) points vs. (65.21 ± 8.27) points; at 1 year postoperatively, (86.93 ± 5.65) points vs. (77.59 ± 5.92) points; both P < 0.01], indicating higher abdominal function satisfaction of the SIEA group postoperatively. The scores of both the SIEA and DIEP groups decreased at 3 months postoperatively compared to preoperative scores (both P < 0.01). At 1 year postoperatively, the score of the SIEA group was similar to preoperative levels, with no statistically significant difference ( P > 0.05), while the score of the DIEP group remained lower than preoperative levels ( P < 0.01). Conclusion:Reconstruction of extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs using SIEA flaps, without injury to the deep tissues of the abdominal wall, allows for near-complete restoration of abdominal function and appearance to preoperative levels, with minimal impact on the donor site. Preoperative 3D-CTA reveals the anatomical variations in the vascular supply of SIEA flaps among individuals, achieving comparable wound repair outcomes to other lower abdominal flaps.
