Comparative study on anterolateral thigh flap by three-dimensional CT angiography assisted design and color Doppler ultrasound in reconstruction after oral cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20210428-00189
- VernacularTitle:CT血管成像及三维重建辅助设计与彩色多普勒超声在口腔癌术后缺损股前外侧皮瓣修复重建中的应用比较
- Author:
Shuangjiang WU
1
;
Lei WANG
;
Yixiu LIU
;
Juan JIA
;
Delin XIA
Author Information
1. 西南医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科，泸州 646000
- Keywords:
Mouth neoplasms;
Soft tissue defects;
Anterolateral thigh flap;
Reconstruction;
CT angiography;
Three-dimensional reconstruction;
Color Doppler ultrasound
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2022;38(10):1102-1110
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effect of three-dimensional CT angiography (CTA) and color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) in reconstruction of soft tissue defects after oral cancer surgery with anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF).Methods:Patients who underwent reconstruction of postoperative defects with ALTF in Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2013 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. According to the imaging method used for examining perforating artery, all patients were divided into two groups. In group A, CTA and three-dimensional vascular reconstruction were used to locate the lateral femoral circumflex artery and its perforating vessels, and the individualized ALTF was designed. In group B, the lateral circumflex femoral artery and its perforating vessels were located by CDU. The clinical features, operation time, flap survival rate, postoperative complication rate, image quality of angiography, difference of superficial skin points of perforating vessels before and during operation, and diameter of perforators were compared between the two groups. The measurement data were expressed by Mean±SD, and the differences between the two groups were compared by independent sample t-test; paired sample t-test was used to compare the intra-group differences; patients’ clinical features and other enumeration data were expressed in the number of cases (%), and analyzed by chi-square test; reliability analysis was adopted for the image quality score of two doctors at different times, taking Cronbach’s α value; correlations between body mass index (BMI) and flap survival rate were tested by Pearson correlation, whereas the correlation between flap survival rate and underlying diseases, drug combination, bad smoking and drinking habits, and surgical complications were tested by Spearman correlation, which were all performed using SPSS version 20.0 at significance level P<0.05. Results:A total of 50 patients with oral cancer were collected, 25 patients in each group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical features such as sex distribution, age, TNM stage, BMI, underlying diseases, drug combination, bad smoking and drinking habits, tumor location and so on ( P>0.05). The mean operation time of group A was significantly shorter than that of group B[(67.64±5.94) min vs. (70.88±4.88) min, P<0.05]. All flaps in group A survived; one case in group B had complete flap necrosis. There was no significant difference in flap survival rate between the two groups(100% vs. 96%, P>0.05). One case in group A and two cases in group B had complications such as effusion of donor site wound, and there was no significant difference ( P>0.05). Compared with the image quality of the two groups, the angiographic quality score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B, the difference was statistically significant [(3.08±0.64) scores vs. (2.56±0.65) scores, P<0.05]. In group A, the distance difference between the position of the skin superficial point of perforator vessel positioned before operation and during operation was significantly shorter than that in group B, and the difference was statistically significant [(1.32±0.50) mm vs. (1.75±0.84) mm, P<0.05]. In group A, the diameter of perforating artery measured by imaging before operation was (1.68±0.17) mm, which had no significant difference with the actual value[(1.70±0.18) mm] ( P>0.05); whereas, in group B, the diameter of perforating artery measured by imaging before operation was (1.77±0.14) mm. The actual measured value during operation was (1.66±0.15) mm, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). A significant correlation emerged between surgical complications and flap survival rate ( r=0.57, P<0.001), however, there were no significant correlations between BMI, combined with basic diseases, combined medication, bad smoking and drinking habits and flap survival ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with CDU, CTA combined with three-dimensional vascular reconstruction is a feasible and reliable method for preoperative evaluation, flap design. The flap preparation time is shorter. Therefore, it is a good method of preoperative vascular localization.
