Value of dual?energy CT?based volumetric iodine?uptake in the evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy in advanced gastric cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671?0274.2019.10.014
- VernacularTitle:能谱CT容积碘含量在晚期胃癌化疗疗效评价中的价值
- Author:
Lifang CHEN
1
;
Gangze FU
;
Dingpin HUANG
;
Yi MAN
;
Yin JIN
;
Qiantong DONG
;
Yingbao HUANG
;
Yongchun CHEN
;
Hongqing WANG
Author Information
1. 温州医科大学附属第一医院放射科
- Keywords:
Dual?energy computed tomography;
Volumetric iodine?uptake;
Advanced gastric neoplasms;
Chemotherapy efficiency
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2019;22(10):977-983
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the value of dual?energy CT?based volumetric iodine?uptake (VIU) in the evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy in advanced gastric cancer. Methods Inclusion criteria of subjects: (1) without previous systematic therapy; (2) with complete clinical information before and after chemotherapy; (3) without contraindications of chemotherapy. Exclusion criteria of subjects: (1) unfinished duration and times of chemotherapy; (2) unmeasurable primary lesions; (3) poor imaging quality or poor gastric filling. Clinical and image data of 52 patients with advanced gastric cancer who were diagnosed by pathology from gastroscopic biopsy, and needed chemotherapy evaluated by imaging and clinical information in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from February 2017 to February 2018 were collected and analyzed. Of 52 patients, 38 were male and 14 were female with the median age of 65 (31?88) years old. All the patients underwent a dual?energy, dual phase?enhanced CT scanning before chemotherapy and after the third chemotherapy session. The parameters of the lesions measured before and after chemotherapy in portal vein phase were as follows: the maximum diameter (the largest diameter among those measured in the cross?sectional, coronal, and sagittal planes), average CT value (the regions of interest were manually pinpointed under cross?sectional planes with largest diameter of the tumor, which did not include regions less than 2 mm to the edge of the tumor) and VIU (lesion volume × iodine concentration). The change rates of maximum lesion diameter, average CT value and VIU before and after chemotherapy were calculated [(post?chemotherapy parameters-pre?chemotherapy parameters) / pre?chemotherapy parameters]. The efficacy of chemotherapy was evaluated by RECIST 1.1 (the change of maximum tumor diameter after chemotherapy), Choi (the change of average CT value after chemotherapy) and VIU (the change of VIU after chemotherapy), respectively, which was categorized by complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Patients with CR, PR, and SD were assigned to the effective group, while those with PD were classified as the ineffective group. Paired t?test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to compare the changes of parameters before and after chemotherapy, whereas Spearman correlation analysis and Kappa test were used for the correlation analysis and the consistency test between the three evaluation criteria ( Kappa≥0.75 indicated good consistency). Results After chemotherapy, the average CT value [(74.01±16.75) HU vs. (81.06±15.87) HU, t=2.202, P=0.030] and median VIU (668.53×102 μg vs. 272.52×102 μg, Z=4.761, P<0.001) decreased significantly, while the difference of the maximum diameter was not statistically significant [(66.71±34.49) mm vs. (78.45±35.62) mm, t=1.708, P=0.091]. The median change rate of VIU (–53.33%) was greater than that of CT values (–5.75%) with significant difference (Z=-5.408, P<0.001). According to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, 47 patients (90.4%, including 19 with PR and 28 with SD) were effective and 5 patients (9.6%) were ineffective. According to the Choi criteria, 45 patients (86.5%, including 37 with PR and 8 with SD) were effective and 7 patients (13.5%) were ineffective. According to the VIU criteria, 46 patients (88.5%, including 41 with PR and 5 with SD) were effective and 6 patients (11.5%) were ineffective. Efficacy comparison among these three criteria showed no significant difference (χ2=0.377, P=0.828). As compared to RECIST 1.1 evaluation, the proportion of PR evaluated by Choi and VIU was significantly higher (χ2=16.861, P<0.001), whereas the proportion of SD was significantly lower (χ2=24.089, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the proportions of PR and SD between VIU and Choi criteria (χ2=0.887, P=0.346). Consistency and correlation analysis showed that the VIU and Choi evaluation criteria presented the highest consistency and correlation ( Kappa=0.912, P<0.001; r=0.916, P<0.001). Conclusion VIU is a feasible parameter for the evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy in advanced gastric cancer, and may be more sensitive than the evaluation criteria based on maximum diameter or change of CT value in the tumor.
