Penile dorsal extension bandaging technique after concealed penis surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20191202-00363
- VernacularTitle:隐匿性阴茎矫治术后阴茎背伸包扎法的效果评价
- Author:
Yuan LI
1
;
Xiaoyu ZHU
;
Dongchuan FENG
;
Jinchao GONG
;
Tao HAN
;
Chunling QIAO
;
Shujing CHEN
Author Information
1. 徐州医科大学附属徐州儿童医院泌尿外科 221006
- Keywords:
Concealed penis;
Bandaging;
Pain measurement
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2021;37(3):304-308
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effect of penile dorsal extension and bandaging after concealed penis surgery.Methods:In this study, 80 children who underwent concealed penile correction were randomly divided into a dorsal extension bandaging group (experimental group) and a traditional bandaging group (control group) from Xuzhou Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University during September 2016 to September 2019. The control group was applied with traditional sleeve-type bandaging, and the test group was treated with penile dorsal extension bandaging. A total of 75 children was summarized in this study. Among them, there were 38 children in the experimental group, with a mean age of 64 months. Thirty-seven children were in the control group, with a mean age of 70 months. The incidence of complications during hospitalization, the number of calls to medical staff within the first 24 hours after surgery, the pain score of the child during dressing removal, and the time taken for dressing removal were compared and recorded. Measurement data were analyzed by t-tests and enumeration data were analyzed by chi-square tests between groups. All data were analyzed using software SPSS 17.0. Results:The incidence of complications during hospitalization was 5.26%(2/38) and 10.81%(4/37) in the experimental and control groups, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant( χ2=0.784, P>0.05). In the dorsal extension bandaging group and the traditional bandaging group, the average number of calls to medical staff 24 hours after surgery was (0.87 ± 0.91) and (1.54 ± 1.02) times, the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.996, P=0.003); as for the highest pain scores of the children when the dressing was removed were 5.21 ± 1.19 and 7.24 ± 1.20, the difference was statistically significant ( t=5.697, P< 0.001); the time taken to remove the dressing was (3.21 ± 1.24) min, (7.56 ± 1.88) min, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=11.917, P<0.001). Conclusions:The penile dorsal extension bandaging method after concealed penis surgery can reduce the number of calls to medical staff, reduce the time of dressing removal and the degree of pain in children.
